Revisions: Gender and Sexuality in Late ModernityThis volume brings together recent sociology of late modernity, particularly sociologies of reflexivity, aesthetics and detraditionalization, with a consideration of transformations of identity, especially transformations of gender and sexual identities. It does so in relation to questions of cultural economy; debates over the role and place of reflexivity in the social sciences; recent controversies over the significance of commodity aesthetics in regard to questions of identity; and debates on the significance of risk for the organization of contemporary sexualities. In so doing it puts forward a distinctive thesis, namely that within late modernity gender and sexuality are being reworked in terms of categories of reflexivity and risk. It shows that this reworking places increasing significance on issues of mobility and identity in late modernity. It therefore outlines the politics of mobility in regard to identity, suggesting that mobility is an important but often neglected source of power in late modernity. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 35
Page 36
But the kind of reflexivity at issue in these kinds of post - traditional communalization does not involve subjectobject forms of knowledge which constitute reflexivity in the accounts of Beck and Giddens .
But the kind of reflexivity at issue in these kinds of post - traditional communalization does not involve subjectobject forms of knowledge which constitute reflexivity in the accounts of Beck and Giddens .
Page 50
Her analysis therefore implies that forms of gender detraditionalization involve a kind of feminization of social fields , and that it is this feminization which is at issue in terms of mobility ( that is , movements within and across ...
Her analysis therefore implies that forms of gender detraditionalization involve a kind of feminization of social fields , and that it is this feminization which is at issue in terms of mobility ( that is , movements within and across ...
Page 117
Yet while Lupton understands the universalization of risk in relation to HIV / AIDS to signal a new kind of regulation in terms of subjection and subjectification for heterosexuals , which incites testing as one such self - regulative ...
Yet while Lupton understands the universalization of risk in relation to HIV / AIDS to signal a new kind of regulation in terms of subjection and subjectification for heterosexuals , which incites testing as one such self - regulative ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
new sociological directions and feminist sociological controversies | 13 |
reflexivity and mobility in social theory | 30 |
gender embodiment and reflexivity | 42 |
Copyright | |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
aesthetic aestheticization analysis appears argues arguments aspects associated assumed assumption attention authority Beck become body Bourdieu central chapter claims concern consider constituted consumer contemporary context CRUZ cultural detraditionalization difference discussion economy emergence especially example Felski femininity feminist feminization fields flexible forms gender and sexuality grounds Hennessy heterosexual hierarchy highlight HIV testing idea identity important increasing increasingly individualization instance involves issue kind knowledge labour Lash Lash's late modernity limits linked logic Lupton masculinity matter McDowell McNay mean mobility modes Moreover moves notes notion organization particular performances politics positions post social structure practices processes question recent reflexive modernization thesis regard relation to gender respondents risk seems self-reflexivity sexuality and gender shifts significance simply society sociology Specifically stance suggests techniques theory tion traditional transformation turn understanding understood University University Library women workers workplace