Revisions: Gender and Sexuality in Late ModernityThis volume brings together recent sociology of late modernity, particularly sociologies of reflexivity, aesthetics and detraditionalization, with a consideration of transformations of identity, especially transformations of gender and sexual identities. It does so in relation to questions of cultural economy; debates over the role and place of reflexivity in the social sciences; recent controversies over the significance of commodity aesthetics in regard to questions of identity; and debates on the significance of risk for the organization of contemporary sexualities. In so doing it puts forward a distinctive thesis, namely that within late modernity gender and sexuality are being reworked in terms of categories of reflexivity and risk. It shows that this reworking places increasing significance on issues of mobility and identity in late modernity. It therefore outlines the politics of mobility in regard to identity, suggesting that mobility is an important but often neglected source of power in late modernity. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 48
Page 13
one new sociological directions . and feminist sociological controversies introduction One of the most influential ( and controversial ) sets of ideas in contemporary sociology is that connected with the reflexive modernization thesis .
one new sociological directions . and feminist sociological controversies introduction One of the most influential ( and controversial ) sets of ideas in contemporary sociology is that connected with the reflexive modernization thesis .
Page 28
While Fraser notes the contemporary political imaginary is increasingly defined by notions of identity , difference and recognition rather than by notions of exploitation and socio - economic redistribution , nevertheless she argues ...
While Fraser notes the contemporary political imaginary is increasingly defined by notions of identity , difference and recognition rather than by notions of exploitation and socio - economic redistribution , nevertheless she argues ...
Page 38
In particular Alexander suggests this move cannot get at ' the kind of critical reflexivity that differentiates contemporary democratic , multicultural and civil societies from earlier more authoritarian , homogeneous and anti ...
In particular Alexander suggests this move cannot get at ' the kind of critical reflexivity that differentiates contemporary democratic , multicultural and civil societies from earlier more authoritarian , homogeneous and anti ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
new sociological directions and feminist sociological controversies | 13 |
reflexivity and mobility in social theory | 30 |
gender embodiment and reflexivity | 42 |
Copyright | |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
aesthetic aestheticization analysis appears argues arguments aspects associated assumed assumption attention authority Beck become body Bourdieu central chapter claims concern consider constituted consumer contemporary context CRUZ cultural detraditionalization difference discussion economy emergence especially example Felski femininity feminist feminization fields flexible forms gender and sexuality grounds Hennessy heterosexual hierarchy highlight HIV testing idea identity important increasing increasingly individualization instance involves issue kind knowledge labour Lash Lash's late modernity limits linked logic Lupton masculinity matter McDowell McNay mean mobility modes Moreover moves notes notion organization particular performances politics positions post social structure practices processes question recent reflexive modernization thesis regard relation to gender respondents risk seems self-reflexivity sexuality and gender shifts significance simply society sociology Specifically stance suggests techniques theory tion traditional transformation turn understanding understood University University Library women workers workplace