The Electoral College and Direct Election: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-fifth Congress, First Session, ... : SupplementU.S. Government Printing Office, 1977 - 537 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 2
... winner of the popular vote will not be elected . This has already happened in three elections , 1824 , 1876 , and 1888. In the last election , the result could have been changed by a small shift of votes in Ohio and Hawaii , despite a ...
... winner of the popular vote will not be elected . This has already happened in three elections , 1824 , 1876 , and 1888. In the last election , the result could have been changed by a small shift of votes in Ohio and Hawaii , despite a ...
Page 8
... winner in each congressional district with the two senatorial votes going to the state's overall popular vote winner . The proportional plan , which would give the state's electoral votes in pro- portion to the division of the popular ...
... winner in each congressional district with the two senatorial votes going to the state's overall popular vote winner . The proportional plan , which would give the state's electoral votes in pro- portion to the division of the popular ...
Page 39
... winner received less than 40 percent of the total vote . Second , the unlikely contingency run - off election that is provided for in S.J. Res . 1 would be limited to an election between only the two strongest national tickets . In ...
... winner received less than 40 percent of the total vote . Second , the unlikely contingency run - off election that is provided for in S.J. Res . 1 would be limited to an election between only the two strongest national tickets . In ...
Page 58
... winner of a cross - sectional popular plurality , ( 2 ) a single election , ( 3 ) the two - party system , ( 4 ) ... winner's margin of victory in the electoral vote . Because the unit rule awards 100 percent of a state's electoral vote to ...
... winner of a cross - sectional popular plurality , ( 2 ) a single election , ( 3 ) the two - party system , ( 4 ) ... winner's margin of victory in the electoral vote . Because the unit rule awards 100 percent of a state's electoral vote to ...
Page 60
... winner of a cross - sectional popular plurality . Is this bias functional given the American idea of democracy ? Plurality sys- tems are an aberration of majoritarian theory which requires that elected of- ficials have the support of a ...
... winner of a cross - sectional popular plurality . Is this bias functional given the American idea of democracy ? Plurality sys- tems are an aberration of majoritarian theory which requires that elected of- ficials have the support of a ...
Common terms and phrases
40 percent abolish the electoral American Bar Association apportionment BAILEY ballot Banzhaf Benjamin Harrison bias biases Birch Bayh Chairman Committee Congress congressional constitutional amendment contingent election conventional count democracy democratic direct election direct popular election direct popular vote district elec elected President electing the President electoral college system electoral majority electoral system electoral votes equal faithless elector favor federal Ford framers George Wallace Gerald Ford gerrymander going groups Grover Cleveland House of Representatives Jimmy Carter legislatures major parties majoritarian minority Nixon number of electoral number of votes Ohio outcome political parties polls popular plurality population present system President and Vice presidential candidates presidential election proposed question received Republican Senator BAYH Senator WALLOP subcommittee ticket tion turnout two-party system U.S. Senate unit rule Vice President voter coalitions votes cast Wallace winner winner-take-all Wyoming York
Popular passages
Page 393 - States, and a Majority of all the States shall be necessary to a Choice. In every Case, after the Choice of the President, the Person having the greatest Number of Votes of the Electors shall be the Vice President. But if there should remain two or more who have equal Votes, the Senate shall chuse from them by Ballot the Vice President. The Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States.
Page 17 - A number of electors of President and Vice President equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives in Congress to which the District would be entitled if it were a State, but in no event more than the least populous state...
Page 97 - In all the changes to which you may be invited, remember that time and habit are at least as necessary to fix the true character of governments, as of other human institutions...
Page 407 - Massachusetts 23 Michigan 24 Minnesota 25 Mississippi 26 Missouri 27 Montana 28 Nebraska 29 Nevada 30 New Hampshire 31 New Jersey 32 New Mexico 33 New York 34 North Carolina 35 North Dakota 36 Ohio 37 Oklahoma 38...
Page 414 - Pythagorean theorem, which states that the square of the hypotenuse of a right triangle equals the sum of the squares of the other two sides.
Page 407 - Different localities 1. Alabama 2. Alaska 3. Arizona 4. Arkansas. 5. California 6. Colorado 7. Connecticut 8. Delaware 9. District of Columbia.. 10. Florida 11.
Page 392 - Baker v. Carr, 369 US 186 (1962), Reynolds v. Sims, 377 US 533 (1964), but in cases overturning State laws that imposed financial burdens (see Harper v.
Page 398 - Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press ; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Page 510 - An ignorant man, who is not fool enough to meddle with his clock, is however sufficiently confident to think he can safely take to pieces, and put together at his pleasure, a moral machine of another guise importance and complexity, composed of far other wheels, and springs, and balances, and counteracting and co-operating powers.
Page 21 - IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES JANUARY 3, 1985 Mr. MATTINGLY (for himself, Mr. EVANS, Mr. THURMOND, and Mr. ARMSTRONG) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary JOINT RESOLUTION Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to allow the President to veto items of appropriation. 1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives...