Environmental Quality: The ... Annual Report of the Council on Environmental Quality, Volume 10, Part 1979Executive Office of the President, Council on Environmental Quality, 1979 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 19
... Figure 1-1 . The figures beside each diagram show how many days during 1977 the air quality was unhealthful or worse and which pollutant was re- sponsible . The 41 SMSAs are grouped according to the pollutant primarily responsible for ...
... Figure 1-1 . The figures beside each diagram show how many days during 1977 the air quality was unhealthful or worse and which pollutant was re- sponsible . The 41 SMSAs are grouped according to the pollutant primarily responsible for ...
Page 21
... Figure 1-1 Status of Air Quality in 41 SMSAs Using. 200 Alert 375 800 17.0 400 1130 Very Unhealthful Significant aggravation of symptoms and de- creased exercise tol- erance in persons with heart or lung disease , with wide- spread ...
... Figure 1-1 Status of Air Quality in 41 SMSAs Using. 200 Alert 375 800 17.0 400 1130 Very Unhealthful Significant aggravation of symptoms and de- creased exercise tol- erance in persons with heart or lung disease , with wide- spread ...
Page 23
... Figure 1-1 ( continued ) CO as predominant problem 300 200 100 Jersey City Kansas City 300 200 Days in PSI Interval 100 Days in PSI interval 100- 200- Pollutant 200 300 > 300 CO 61 8 Oxidants 5 66 Louisville 300 200 扔 0000 100 Memphis ...
... Figure 1-1 ( continued ) CO as predominant problem 300 200 100 Jersey City Kansas City 300 200 Days in PSI Interval 100 Days in PSI interval 100- 200- Pollutant 200 300 > 300 CO 61 8 Oxidants 5 66 Louisville 300 200 扔 0000 100 Memphis ...
Page 24
... Figure 1-1. Days in PSI Interval Figure 1-1 ( continued ) CO as predominant problem 300 200 000 100 New York 300 200 100 O T Oklahoma City 300 200 T 080 100 50 50 300 200 100 000 O L T 50 100 PSI Interval 100- Days in PSI interval 200 ...
... Figure 1-1. Days in PSI Interval Figure 1-1 ( continued ) CO as predominant problem 300 200 000 100 New York 300 200 100 O T Oklahoma City 300 200 T 080 100 50 50 300 200 100 000 O L T 50 100 PSI Interval 100- Days in PSI interval 200 ...
Page 25
... Figure 1-1 ( continued ) CO. Figure 1-1 ( continued ) Days in PSI interval Portland 300 200 100 50 100 200 300 400 500 Sacramento 300 200 100 50 100 200 300 400 500 Salt Lake City 300 200 L 100 50 100 200 300 400 500 Days in PSI interval ...
... Figure 1-1 ( continued ) CO. Figure 1-1 ( continued ) Days in PSI interval Portland 300 200 100 50 100 200 300 400 500 Sacramento 300 200 100 50 100 200 300 400 500 Salt Lake City 300 200 L 100 50 100 200 300 400 500 Days in PSI interval ...
Contents
120 | |
126 | |
140 | |
166 | |
174 | |
188 | |
199 | |
205 | |
214 | |
222 | |
230 | |
240 | |
261 | |
276 | |
291 | |
302 | |
309 | |
315 | |
321 | |
330 | |
371 | |
375 | |
389 | |
392 | |
522 | |
528 | |
534 | |
548 | |
555 | |
569 | |
577 | |
583 | |
603 | |
616 | |
623 | |
633 | |
639 | |
648 | |
655 | |
668 | |
678 | |
684 | |
690 | |
696 | |
702 | |
708 | |
816 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
acres Administration agricultural air pollution air quality Annual areas Assessment Basin cancer carbon monoxide carcinogens chemical cities Clean Air Act Clean Water Clean Water Act coastal Congress Conservation costs counties dioxide dioxin disposal drinking water dumping economic effects emissions energy environment Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Quality EPA's estimates exposure facilities federal Figure Forest fuel ground water hazardous waste Ibid impact increase industrial Lakes land Love Canal ment million monitoring municipal National NEPA noise Oxidants ozone percent pesticides phosphorus planning pollution control population problems proposed PSI interval recycling region regulations Report risk sewage sewer SMSAs soil Solid Waste standards sulfur dioxide supra note surface Table tests tion U.S. Department U.S. Environmental Protection U.S. Government Printing unhealthful United urban violation Washington wastewater Water Act water pollution water quality Wildlife µg/m³
Popular passages
Page 746 - Americans safe, healthful, productive, and esthetically and culturally pleasing surroundings 3. attain the widest range of beneficial uses of the environment without degradation, risk to health or safety, or other undesirable and unintended consequences 4. preserve important historic, cultural, and natural aspects of our national heritage, and maintain, wherever possible, an environment which supports diversity and variety of individual choice 5.
Page 746 - Copies of such statement and the comments and views of the appropriate Federal, State, and local agencies, which are authorized to develop and enforce environmental standards, shall be made available to the President, the Council on Environmental Quality and to the public as provided by section 552 of title 5. United States Code, and shall accompany the proposal through the existing agency review processes...
Page 783 - Government shall (A) utilize a systematic, interdisciplinary approach which will insure the integrated use of the natural and social sciences and the environmental design arts in planning and in decisionmaking which may have an impact on man's environment...
Page 734 - Act, the Safe Drinking Water Act. and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act...
Page 746 - ... include in every recommendation or report on proposals for legislation and other major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, a detailed statement by the responsible official on — (i) the environmental impact of the proposed action...
Page 243 - The legislation defines hazardous waste "as a solid waste, or combination of solid wastes, which because of its quantity, concentration, or physical, chemical, or infectious characteristics, may cause, or significantly contribute to an increase in mortality or an increase in serious irreversible, or incapacitating reversible, illness...
Page 746 - Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, a detailed statement by the responsible official on- (I) the environmental impact of the proposed action, (ii) any adverse environmental effects which cannot be avoided should the proposal be implemented, (iii) alternatives to the proposed action, (iv) the relationship between local short-term uses of man's environment and the maintenance and enhancement of longterm productivity, and (v) any irreversible and irretrievable...
Page 790 - Tiering' refers to the coverage of general matters in broader environmental impact statements (such as national program or policy statements) with subsequent narrower statements or environmental analyses (such as regional or basinwide program statements or ultimately site-specific statements) incorporating by reference the general discussions and concentrating solely on the issues specific to the statement subsequently prepared.
Page 743 - ... to create and maintain conditions under which man and nature can exist in productive harmony, and fulfill the social, economic, and other requirements of present and future generations of Americans.
Page 742 - The conservation of our natural resources and their proper use constitute the fundamental problem which underlies almost every other problem of our National life.