| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources - 1994 - 122 pages
...environmental, budgetary and economic considerations. President Clinton made clear that the United States does not encourage the civil use of plutonium and, accordingly, does not itself engage in plutonium reprocessing for either nuclear power or nuclear explosive purposes. He also made clear, however, that... | |
| Peter Beck - 1994 - 148 pages
...September 1993, 'Non-proliferation and export control policy', states, inter alia: 'The United States does not encourage the civil use of plutonium and, accordingly, does not itself engage in plutonium reprocessing for either nuclear power or nuclear explosive purposes.' have its spent fuel temporarily... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Environment and Public Works - 1994 - 110 pages
...the analytic framework for this judgment. The CHAIRMAN. Mr. Curtis, you say that the United States does not encourage the civil use of plutonium, and accordingly does not itself engage in the reprocessing of plutonium for either nuclear power or nuclear explosive purposes, but you are reexamining... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources - 1994 - 110 pages
...options for plutonium disposition. The President made clear in his statement that the United States does not encourage the civil use of plutonium and, accordingly, does not engage in plutonium reprocessing for either nuclear power or for nuclear explosive purposes. He also... | |
| |