...that "[a]n agency changing its course by rescinding a rule is obligated to supply a reasoned analysis for the change beyond that which may be required when an agency does not act in the first instance." 149 But just how reasoned this analysis must be remains subject to the arbitrary and capricious test....

...Accordingly, an agency changing its course by rescinding a rule is obligated to supply a reasoned analysis for the change beyond that which may be required when an agency does not act in the first instance. 463 US at 41-42. Accord, Ventura Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 765 F.2d 184, 191 (DC Cir. 1985); Massachusetts...

...standards. An agency changing its course by rescinding a rule is obligated to supply a reasoned analysis for the change beyond that which may be required when an agency does not act in the first instance. While the scope of review under the "arbitrary and capricious" standard is narrow and a court is not...

...by rescinding a rule is obligated to supply a reasoned analysis for the change beyond that which nay be required when an agency does not act in the first instance. 463 US at 41-42. Accord, Ventura Broadcasting Co. v. FCC. 765 F.2d 184, 191 (DC Cir. 1985); Massachusetts...

...quote, "an agency changing its course by rescinding a rule is obligated to supply a reasoned analysis for the change beyond that which may be required when an agency does not act in the first place." I have submitted my full comments for the record and I ask that they be printed with the hearings....

...that "an agency changing its course by rescinding a rule is obligated to supply a reasoned analysis for the change beyond that which may be required when an agency doeo not art in the first instance."44 The Court then articulated the test for "substantive" judicial...

...changing its course by rescinding a rule is obligated to supply s reasoned analysis for the change beyond which may be required when an agency does not act in the first instance." 463 U .S . 29, 41-42(1983). The court acknowledged that rules need not last forever. It noted, however,...

...regulations and litigation. "[A]n agency changing its course ... is obligated to supply a reasoned analysis for the change beyond that which may be required when an agency does not act in the first instance." Motor Vehicle Bureau Mfrs. Assn. v. State Farm Mutual, 463 US 29, 43 (1983). Moreover, more than 30...

...changing circumstances," but "an agency changing its course ... is obligated to supply a reasoned analysis for the change beyond that which may be required when an agency does not act in the first instance." Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass'n of United States. Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 463 US 29, 42 (1983),...

...Accordingly, an agency changing its course by rescinding a rule is obligated to supply a reasoned analysis for the change beyond that which may be required when an agency does not act in the first instance. . . . The ultimate question before us is whether NHTSA's rescission of the passive restraint requirement...