 The best available evidence, the writings of the architects of our constitutional system, indicates that the Bill of Attainder Clause was intended not as a narrow, technical (and therefore soon to be outmoded) prohibition, but rather as an implementation...  Consumer Product Safety Commission Reauthorization: Hearing Before the ... - Page 314by United States. Congress. House. Committee on Energy and Commerce. Subcommittee on Commerce, Consumer Protection, and Competitiveness - 1988 - 393 pagesFull view - About this book
 | United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics - 1965 - 852 pages
...of the Constitution." The bill of attainder clause, the Court went on to explain, "was intended ... as an implementation of the separation of powers,...function, or more simply — trial by legislature." The clause also reflected the Constitution framers' belief, the Court said, that the legislature is... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1965 - 942 pages
...Bill of Attainder Clause was intended not as a narrow, technical (and therefore soon to be outmoded) prohibition, but rather as an implementation of the...function, or more simply — trial by legislature. The Constitution divides the National Government into three branches — Legislative, Executive and... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education and Labor - 1967 - 1218 pages
...bill of attainder clause was intended not as a narrow, technical (and therefore soon to be outmoded) prohibition, but rather as an implementation of the...general safeguard against legislative exercise of judicial function, or more simply trial by the legislature." " The penalties imposed by § 1201 bear... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Appropriations - 1968 - 406 pages
...bill of attainder clause was intended not as a narrow, technical (and therefore soon to be outmoded) prohibition, but rather as an implementation of the...general safeguard against legislative exercise of judicial function, or more simply trial by legislature." United States \. Hroirn. 381 US 437. 442 (1965).... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. House Administration Committee - 1975 - 594 pages
...a narrow, technical prohibition, as pointed out in United States v. Brown, 391 US 437, 442 (1985), but "rather as an implementation of the separation...function, or more simply — trial by legislature." In examining the scope and intent of the Bill of Attainder clause, the court in United States v. Brown,... | |
| |
