San Francisco Municipal Reports ... |
Contents
1 | |
3 | |
21 | |
126 | |
152 | |
167 | |
184 | |
194 | |
196 | |
197 | |
255 | |
308 | |
365 | |
385 | |
406 | |
422 | |
436 | |
461 | |
469 | |
481 | |
502 | |
514 | |
520 | |
522 | |
567 | |
817 | |
818 | |
1014 | |
1030 | |
1079 | |
1122 | |
1124 | |
1142 | |
1165 | |
1171 | |
1179 | |
1186 | |
1193 | |
1211 | |
1217 | |
1246 | |
1252 | |
1262 | |
1310 | |
1333 | |
1346 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
08 Clear Almshouse Amount April Assistant AUDITED DEMANDS Auto avenue basalt Bituminous rock pavement Board of Education Board of Health Board of Public Board of Supervisors Bond Fund Bond Interest Fund Bond Redemption Fund Butchertown California certificates City and County Clerk construction County Clerk County of S. F. County of San Demands Paid Department Diseases District Driver Electrical ENDING JUNE 30 Expenses Fees feet fire FISCAL YEAR ENDING Furniture Golden Gate Park granite curbs H street Hardware Horses Hoseman Hoseman Hoseman Inspectors ironstone pipe sewer July June 30 Lake Merced Maintenance of Minors Miss Mission Block Mission street Municipal pavement and granite Public Building quiet title Ready for trial Refund Rent Repairs Salaries San Francisco School Fund Sept Service Spring Valley Stationery Stenographer Superintendent Supplies Tax Collector teachers Total number Transferred Truckman Typewriting Vehicle Wagon Water Western Addition Block
Popular passages
Page 1009 - The conclusion is, that although a law is general and constitutional when it applies equally to all persons embraced in a class founded upon some natural or intrinsic or constitutional distinction, it is not general or constitutional if it confers particular privileges or imposes peculiar disabilities or burdensome conditions, in the exercise of a common right, upon a class of persons arbitrarily selected from the general body of those who stand in precisely the same relation to the subject of the...
Page 941 - County, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the original Resolution No.
Page 939 - Petitioner is in the custody of the sheriff of the city and county of San Francisco...
Page 541 - Any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars, or by imprisonment in the County Jail for not more than six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment.
Page 545 - Any person, firm or corporation violating or failing to comply with any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine...
Page 435 - ... county recorder have been, or shall hereafter be, lost or destroyed, in whole or in any material part by flood, fire or earthquake, all papers filed under order of court nunc pro tune as of the date when they should have been filed, shall have the...
Page 545 - Any person or persons violating any of the provisions of this section shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine in any sum not exceeding one thousand (1,000) dollars, or by imprisonment for a period not exceeding two years, or by both such fine and imprisonment.
Page 541 - Sec. 5. All members of the Police Department and employees of the Board of Health are hereby specifically required to enforce the provisions of this Ordinance, and shall have the right to enter any and all premises for the purpose of ascertaining as to the sanitary condition thereof, and any person denying or obstructing such entry shall be subject to the penalty herein provided.
Page 541 - Garbage" as herein defined shall be placed by the person, firm or corporation occupying the premises upon which such garbage is created, in a water-tight metal receptacle approved by the Board of Health, which receptacle shall be kept closed by a close-fitting metal cover.
Page 991 - The defendant has not yet answered to the complaint, and the order to show cause why an injunction pendente lite should not issue has been continued from time to time and is now set for February 3, 1908.