Undercover Operations Act: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Criminal Law of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-eighth Congress, Second Session, on S. 804 ... May 16, 1984U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984 - 362 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 79
Page
... Second Session, on S. 804 ... May 16, 1984 United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Criminal Law. KF 26 .J8378 1984c THE LIBRAI CONGRESS CONGRESS , THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS LIBRAR. Front Cover.
... Second Session, on S. 804 ... May 16, 1984 United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Criminal Law. KF 26 .J8378 1984c THE LIBRAI CONGRESS CONGRESS , THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS LIBRAR. Front Cover.
Page 2
... Justice Department law en- forcement agencies express statutory authority to engage in under- cover operations . It would grant these agencies permanent exemp- tions for some of the legal restrictions that have impeded 2.
... Justice Department law en- forcement agencies express statutory authority to engage in under- cover operations . It would grant these agencies permanent exemp- tions for some of the legal restrictions that have impeded 2.
Page 15
... pation in a Federal undercover operation ; or " ( 2 ) negligence on the part of Federal employees in the supervision or exercise of control over an under- cover operation , S 804 IS 12 1 shall have a cause of action against the 15.
... pation in a Federal undercover operation ; or " ( 2 ) negligence on the part of Federal employees in the supervision or exercise of control over an under- cover operation , S 804 IS 12 1 shall have a cause of action against the 15.
Page 23
... cover operations , while retaining necessary fiscal controls . D. Bank deposits Federal officers are generally prohibited by law from depositing public funds in a bank . Yet this is often necessary in an undercover operation , either to ...
... cover operations , while retaining necessary fiscal controls . D. Bank deposits Federal officers are generally prohibited by law from depositing public funds in a bank . Yet this is often necessary in an undercover operation , either to ...
Page 25
... cover operation targeted at a specific type of criminal activity , and for the phase of the operation in which an identified in- dividual is to be given an opportunity to engage in a criminal act . Unless special circumstances are ...
... cover operation targeted at a specific type of criminal activity , and for the phase of the operation in which an identified in- dividual is to be given an opportunity to engage in a criminal act . Unless special circumstances are ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Abscam ACLU Angelo Errichetti approval Attorney General's Guidelines authorization believe bill bribe Chairman Charles McC citizens civil liberties COLCOR CONGRESS THE LIBRARY Counsel Court criminal activity defendant Department of Justice dercover Director Edwards Committee engage in criminal entrapment entrapment defense Errichetti evidence FBI undercover operations FBI's federal Fourth Amendment Ibid illegal activity inducement infiltration initiation innocent intrusive involved judges Judiciary July 29 Justice Department law enforcement law enforcement agencies lawyer legislation LIBRARY OF CONGRESS meeting ment middlemen note 1 supra offer Operation Corkscrew Operations Review Committee person political corruption politicians pose probable cause procedures proposed prosecution prosecutor protect public officials reasonable suspicion recommendations reliable require risk safeguards Section Select Committee Transcripts Senate Select Committee Senator MATHIAS statute statutory sting operation Subcommittee target testimony tion undercover activities undercover agent undercover employee Undercover Operations Guidelines Undercover Operations Review undercover technique United United States Attorney Webster Weinberg
Popular passages
Page 85 - ... based upon the exercise or performance or the failure to exercise or perform a discretionary function or duty on the part of a federal agency or an employee of the Government, whether or not the discretion involved be abused.
Page 71 - Neither this Court nor any member of it has ever expressed the view that the Fourth Amendment protects a wrongdoer's misplaced belief that a person to whom he voluntarily confides his wrongdoing will not reveal it.
Page 350 - Finally, while the inquiry must focus primarily on the conduct of the law enforcement agent, that conduct is not to be viewed in a vacuum; it should also be judged by the effect it would have on a normally law-abiding person situated in the circumstances of the case at hand.
Page 277 - The historical judgment, which the Fourth Amendment accepts, is that unreviewed executive discretion may yield too readily to pressures to obtain incriminating evidence and overlook potential invasions of privacy and protected speech.
Page 56 - Goldstein, For Harold Lasswell: Some Reflections on Human Dignity, Entrapment, Informed Consent, and the Plea Bargain, 84 Yale LJ 683 (1975); Williams, The Defense of Entrapment and Related Problems in Criminal Prosecution, 28 Ford.L.Rev.
Page 288 - To determine whether entrapment has been established, a line must be drawn between the trap for the unwary innocent and the trap for the unwary criminal.
Page 71 - The risk of being overheard by an eavesdropper or betrayed by an informer or deceived as to the identity of one with whom one deals is probably inherent in the conditions of human society. It is the kind of risk we necessarily assume whenever we speak.
Page 85 - States for injury or loss of property, or personal injury or death caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee of the government while acting within the scope of his office or employment, under circumstances where the United States, if a private person, would be liable to the claimant in accordance with the law of the place where the act or omission occurred.
Page 3 - This morning the Subcommittee on Civil and Constitutional Rights of the House Judiciary Committee continues its hearings on HR 5030, theproppsed legislative charter for the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Page 56 - It is surely sheer fiction to suggest that a conviction cannot be had when a defendant has been entrapped by government officers or informers because "Congress could not have intended that its statutes were to be enforced by tempting innocent persons into violations." In these cases raising claims of entrapment, the only legislative intention that can with any show of reason be extracted from the statute is the intention to make criminal precisely the conduct in which the defendant has engaged.