Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 4U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1992 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 7
... demonstrating that review is warranted is on the petitioners . The petitioners in this case have not carried that burden . 1AES is a wholly - owned subsidiary of Atlas . 2 While Missouri is authorized to issue RCRA permits in lieu of ...
... demonstrating that review is warranted is on the petitioners . The petitioners in this case have not carried that burden . 1AES is a wholly - owned subsidiary of Atlas . 2 While Missouri is authorized to issue RCRA permits in lieu of ...
Page 9
... demonstration , preliminary hydrologic , geologic , and meteoro- logic assessments will suffice . 40 CFR § 270.23 ( b ) . 6 See note 5 supra . weight of the hardware encasing the waste ) . See VOLUME 4 ATLAS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES , INC ...
... demonstration , preliminary hydrologic , geologic , and meteoro- logic assessments will suffice . 40 CFR § 270.23 ( b ) . 6 See note 5 supra . weight of the hardware encasing the waste ) . See VOLUME 4 ATLAS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES , INC ...
Page 12
... demonstration in the petition for review that this issue was raised at the public hearing or during the public comment period , as re- quired by Section 124.19 , we conclude that this issue has not been preserved for review . We also ...
... demonstration in the petition for review that this issue was raised at the public hearing or during the public comment period , as re- quired by Section 124.19 , we conclude that this issue has not been preserved for review . We also ...
Page 23
... demonstrating that review is warranted is on the Petitioners . Petitioners have failed to meet this burden with respect to the other proposed grounds for review . CONCLUSION This proceeding is remanded and the Region is directed to ...
... demonstrating that review is warranted is on the Petitioners . Petitioners have failed to meet this burden with respect to the other proposed grounds for review . CONCLUSION This proceeding is remanded and the Region is directed to ...
Page 25
... demonstrating that the permit conditions should be reviewed is therefore on the petitioner . In this case , the petitioners have not carried that burden . Background : An earlier version of the permit was issued on April 8 , 1991 ...
... demonstrating that the permit conditions should be reviewed is therefore on the petitioner . In this case , the petitioners have not carried that burden . Background : An earlier version of the permit was issued on April 8 , 1991 ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Adcom Agency Agency's alleged amended argues argument asserts authority BACT Biddle Sawyer biomonitoring certification Clean Water Act complaint compliance conclude corrective action Crumb Rubber demonstration determination discharge disposal draft permit dredged EAJA effluent effluent limitations emissions EPA Region EPA's EPCRA evidentiary hearing request facility failed federal filed final permit GE's Genicom Hadson hazardous waste HSWA impact implementing incinerator Initial Decision interim submission issuance ment motion NPDES Appeal NPDES permit Odessa operation outfall penalty permit application permit conditions permit decision permit modification permittee petition for review Petitioner PG&E pollutants Presiding Officer Presiding Officer's procedures proposed provides pursuant raised RCRA Appeal reasons Region II Region's Response Regional Administrator regulations remand requirements revised Ronald L rule Section SELC specific submitted Subpart SWMU tion treatment TSCA U.S. EPA VDAPC violation Waste Management water quality standards Wego
Popular passages
Page 354 - ... (A) cause, or significantly contribute to an increase in mortality or an increase in serious irreversible, or incapacitating reversible, illness; or (B) pose a substantial present or potential hazard to human health or the environment when improperly treated, stored, transported, or disposed of. or otherwise managed.
Page 633 - First, the private interest that will be affected by the official action; second, the risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used, and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards; and finally, the Government's interest, including the function involved and the fiscal and administrative burdens that the additional or substitute procedural requirement would entail.
Page 525 - If evidence is objected to at the trial on the ground that it is not within the issues made by the pleadings, the court may allow the pleadings to be amended and shall do so freely when the presentation of the merits of the action.
Page 331 - ... records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes, but only to the extent that the production of such law enforcement records or information...
Page 288 - best available control technology" means an emission limitation based on the maximum degree of reduction of each pollutant subject to regulation under this Act emitted from or which results from any major emitting facility, which the permitting authority, on a case-by-case basis, taking into account energy, environmental, and economic impacts and other costs, determines is achievable for such...
Page 531 - Evidence of (1) furnishing or offering or promising to furnish, or (2) accepting or offering or promising to accept, a valuable consideration in compromising or attempting to compromise a claim which was disputed as to either validity or amount, is not admissible to prove liability for or in validity of the claim or its amount.
Page 607 - A thing is deemed to be affixed to land when it is attached to it by roots, as in the case of trees, vines, or shrubs; or imbedded in it, as in case of walls; or permanently resting upon it, as in the case of buildings; or permanently attached to what is thus permanent, as by means of cement, plaster, nails, bolts, or screws.
Page 56 - An employee shall avoid any action, whether or not specifically prohibited by this subpart, which might result in, or create the appearance of: (1) Using public office for private gain; (2) Giving preferential treatment to any person; (3) Impeding Government efficiency or economy; (4) Losing complete independence or impartiality; (5) Making a Government decision outside official channels; or (6) Affecting adversely the confidence of the public in the integrity of the Government.
Page 265 - ... In any case where the owner or operator of such facility demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Federal Land Manager, and the Federal Land Manager so certifies, that the emissions from such facility will have no adverse impact on the air quality-related values of such lands (including visibility) notwithstanding the fact that the change in air quality resulting from emissions from such facility will cause or contribute to concentrations which exceed the maximum allowable increases for class...
Page 327 - No agency shall disclose any record which is contained in a system of records by any means of communication to any person, or to another agency, except pursuant to a written request by, or with the prior written consent of, the individual to whom the record pertains, unless disclosure of the record would be...