istrative remedies under 40 C.F.R. § 124.19(f)(1)(iii). On the other issues raised by Amoco, review is denied for the reasons set forth above. So ordered. SUBJECT INDEX This subject index contains references to key words, phrases, and topics in decisions reported in A Abuse of discretion language, failure to change to reflect responses to permittee's comments state portion of RCRA permit, HWSA portion bearing similar requirements to 4:762-765 ......... 4:69; 4:70-71 4:781-782 4:736-747 4:81-83 disclosure for subpoena purposes, coverage and exceptions under Privacy Protection Act petitions, incorrectly addressed. Administrative penalties (See Penalty appeals procedures) Administrative record anticipated construction emissions erroneously omitted by permit issuer, supplementation with....... evidence of objections raised by permittee during draft permit comment period, lack of...... factual basis for effluent discharge's potential for violating state requirements, supplementation with ....... new information submitted by permittee, supplementation with 4:325-333 4:590-591 ... 4:275 4:165-166 4:713 4:20-22 impact of facility on, failure to consider in granting RCRA permit inversions increasing dangers from waste disposal facility modeling PSD permits verification process. new major stationary sources of pollution, requirements for Alternative waste disposal methods PCBs destruction ...... distillation of PCBs from transformers Safe Drinking Water Act requirements not including. Amended complaints procedural rules Amended permit renewal applications provision of accurate and complete information Amended permits 4:6-15 4:881-882 4:293-297 4:103-104 4:834 4:888-889; 4:900-903 . 4:203-207; 4:523-525; 4:827-830 4:683-684 omission of recordkeeping requirements provision from 4:24-28 settlement agreements leading to 4:25 Amended regulations water quality standards, failure to consider amended regulations to complaints (See Penalty appeals procedures, subhead complaints) defective appeal's sufficient clarity in spite of procedural defects 4:505 dismissal of appeal, commercial applicator vs. private applicator status under FIFRA .... 4:550-558 interlocutory appeals (See Interlocutory appeals, penalty procedures) preservation of issue for review, failure to ensure 4:439-440 procedural issues (See Penalty appeals procedures) remanded issues (See Remands, penalty appeals) standard of review, de novo review of Presiding Officer's factual and legal 4:550-558 stay of proceedings to allow sufficient time to properly consider issue. discretionary review, threshold procedural requirements for obtaining .... 4:806-818 4:636-639 preservation of issue for review (See Preservation of issue for review, permit appeals) sufficiency of petition for review (See Petition for review, permit appeals, subhead Application for attorneys' fees and costs sufficiency of petition for review) jurisdictionally defective Application for permit 4:921-935; 4:950-953 NPDES permits, amended permit renewal applications for provision of accurate and complete information RCRA permits, defectiveness of application for state portion UIC permit, inadequacy of information provided for Applicator, private vs. commercial FIFRA status Arbitrary and capricious standard of review, permit appeals deadlines for submissions....... hazardous constituent vs. hazardous waste constituent. interim measures provisions land disposal units, denial of. Areas of concern (AOCs) confirmatory sampling requirements, RCRA permits .... corrective action requirements in RCRA permit RFI requirements, RCRA permits.......... SWMUs, receiving same level of investigation and remediation as Arsenic monitoring placer mining Asbestos-containing materials information request letter and compliance order, failure to respond Ash disposal adequately to testing and plans for, PSD permits Attainment and unclassified areas PSD permit requirements Attorneys' fees and costs application for, jurisdictionally defective jurisdiction to award expenses in enforcement action based on alleged violations of TSCA reasonableness of amount special circumstances rendering award unjust substantial justification 4:501-512 4:96-98 4:260; 4:834 4:921-935; 4:950-953 4:912-953 4:939-949 4:937-939 4:935-937 |