BIBLIOGRAPHY OF ARTICLES ON FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE1

Beghtol, THE CASE AGAINST PROPOSED AND ALTERNATIVE RULE 74 [RECORD ON APPEAL] AS PREPARED BY THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON RULES OF COURT PROCEDURE, 61 A. B. A. Reports 473. (1936).

Blume, REVIEW OF FACTS IN JURY CASES-THE SEVENTH AMENDMENT, 20 J. Am. Jud. Soc. 130 (1936).

Blume, REVIEW OF FACTS IN NON-JURY CASES, 20 J. Am. Jud. Soc. 68 (1936).

Callahan and Ferguson, EVIDENCE AND THE NEW FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 45 Yale L. J. 622 (1936). Callahan and Ferguson, EVIDEnce and the New FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 2, 47 Yale L. J. 194 (1937). Chesnut, ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED New Federal Rules of CIVIL PROCEDURE, 22 A. B. A. J. 533 (1936).

Clark and Moore, A NEW FEDERAL CIVIL PROCEDURE—I. THE BACKGROUND, 44 Yale L. J. 387 (1935); II. PleadINGS AND PARTIES, 44 Yale L. J. 1291 (1935).

Clark and Stone, REVIEW OF FINDINGS OF FACT, 4 U. of Chi. L. Rev. 190 (1937).

Clark, A STRIKING FEATURE OF THE PROPOSED NEW RULES, ETC., 22 A. B. A. J. 787 (1936).

Clark, POWER OF THE SUPREME COURT TO MAKE RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, 49 Harv. L. Rev. 1303 (1936). Clark, REVIEW OF FACTS UNDER PROPOSED FEDERAL RULES, 20 J. Am. Jud. Soc. 129 (1936).

Clark, THE CHALLENGE FOR A NEW FEDERAL PROCEDURE, 19 J. Am. Jud. Soc. 8 (1935).

Clark, THE CHALLENGE OF A NEW FEDERAL PROCEDURE, 20 Corn. L. Q. 443 (1935).

Clark, THE NEW FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE: THE LAST PHASE-UNDERLYING PHILOSOPHY EMBODIED IN SOME OF THE BASIC PROVISIONS OF THE NEW PROCEDURE, 23 A. B. A. J. 976 (1937).

1 This bibliography includes only articles published after the passage of the Act of June 19, 1934, c. 651.

Clark, THE PROPOSED FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 22 A. B. A. J. 447 (1936).

Conboy, DEPOSITIONS, DISCOVERY, AND SUMMARY JUDG-
MENTS-AS DEALT WITH IN TITLE V OF THE PROPOSED
RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR THE FEDERAL COURTS,
22 A. B. A. J. 881 (1936).

Cook, "FACTS" AND "STATEMENTS OF FACT," 4 U. of Chi. L.
Rev. 233 (1937).
Cummings, ADDRESS TO THE FIFTH ANNUAL MEETING OF
THE FEDERAL JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE FOURTH CIR-
CUIT, June 6, 1935, 21 A. B. A. J. 403.

Dobie, RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN FEDERAL PROCEDURE, 21
Va. L. Rev. 876 (1935).

Eagleton, PROPOSED "PARTIES" AND "JOINDER" SECTIONS FOR FEDERAL PLEADING RULES, 3 U. of Chi. L. Rev. 597 (1936).

Eagleton, Two FUNDAMENTALS FOR FEDERAL PLEADING REFORM, 3 U. of Chi. L. Rev. 376 (1936).

Evans, JUDGE EVANS PREVIEWS THE RULES, 17 Chi. Bar Rec. 263 (1936).

Fee, THE PROPOSED NEW RULES FOR UNIFORM PROCEDURE IN THE FEDERAL DISTRICT COURTS, 16 Ore. L. Rev. 103 (1937).

Finch, SOME FUNDAMENTAL AND PRACTICAL OBJECTIONS TO THE PRELIMINARY DRAFT, ETC., 22 A. B. A. J. 809 (1936). Gavit, A DECLARATORY JUDGMENT FOR PROCEDURE, 22 A. B. A. J. 898 (1936).

Gavit, THE NEW FEDERAL RULES AND INDIANA PROCEDURE, 13 Ind. L. J. 203 (1938).

Grimm, UNIFORM RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE DISTRICT COURTS OF THE UNITED STATES, 5 Kan. City L. Rev. 192 (1937).

Hammond, SOME CHANGES IN THE PRELIMINARY DRAFT OF THE PROPOSED FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 23 A. B. A. J. 629 (1937).

Hughes, Chief Justice, REMARKS TO THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE, May 9, 1935, 55 Sup. Ct. xxxv-XXXIX, 21 A. B. A. J. 340 (1935); May 7, 1936, 56 Sup. Ct. LIV, 22 A. B. A. J. 374; May 6, 1937, 23 A. B. A. J. 430 (June

Ilsen, THE PRELIMINARY DRAFT OF FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 11 St. John's L. Rev. 212 (1937). Ingelhart, THE INDIANA RULE MAKING ACT, HOW PROCEDURE TO PRACTICE CAN BE IMPROVED UNDER THE ACT-PART III, 13 Ind. L. J. 14 (1937).

Jaffin, FEDERAL PROCEDURAL REVISION, 21 Va. L. Rev. 504 (1935).

James, TRIAL BY JURY AND THE NEW FEDERAL RULES OF PROCEDURE, 45 Yale L. J. 1022 (1936).

Johnson, DEPOSITIONS, DISCOVERY, AND SUMMARY JUDGMENTS UNDER THE PROPOSED Uniform Federal Rules, 16 Tex. L. Rev. 191 (1938).

Koenigsberger, JURY TRIALS UNDER THE NEW RULES, 61 A. B. A. Reports 479 (1936).

Lesar, CLASS SUITS AND THE FEDERAL RULES, 22 Minn. L. Rev. 34 (1937).

McCaskill, ONE FORM OF CIVIL ACTION, BUT WHAT PROCEDURE, FOR THE FEDERAL COURTS, 30 Ill. L. Rev. 415 (1935).

Millar, NOTABILIA OF AMERICAN CIVIL PROCEDURE, 50 Harv. L. Rev. 1017 (1937).

Millar, THE MECHANISM OF FACT-DISCOVERY: A STUDY IN COMPARATIVE CIVIL PROCEDURE, 32 Ill. L. Rev. 261, 424, at 450 (1937).

Miller, PROPOSED FEDERAL PROCEDURE RULES, 11 Tulane L. Rev. 425 (1937).

Mitchell, ATTITUDE OF ADVISORY COMMITTEE, ETC., 22 A. B. A. J. 780 (1936).

Mitchell, REFORM IN JUDICIAL PROCEDURE, 24 A. B. A. J. 197 (1938).

Mitchell, SOME OF THE PROBLEMS CONFRONTING THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE IN RECENT MONTHS, ETC., 23 A. B. A. J. 966 (1937).

Moore and Cohn, FEDERAL CLASS ACTIONS, 32 Ill. L. Rev. 307 (1937).

Moore and Cohn, FEDERAL CLASS ACTIONS JURISDICTION AND EFFECT OF JUDGMENT, 32 Ill. L. Rev. 555 (1938). Moore and Levi, FEDERAL INTERVENTION: I. THE RIGHT TO INTERVENE AND REORGANIZATION, 45 Yale L. J. 565 (1936). Moore, FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE: SOME PROBLEMS RAISED BY THE PRELIMINary Draft, 25 Geo. L. J. 551 (1937).

Nesbitt, THE PROPOSED RULES FOR CHANGES IN FEDERAL PRACTICE, 43 W. Va. L. Q. 23 (1936) and 110 (1937). Ohlinger, QUESTIONS RAISED BY THE REPORT OF THE ADVISORY COMmittee on RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR THE DISTRICT COURTS OF THE UNITED STATES, 11 U. of Cinn. L. Rev. 445 (1937).

Patterson, A FEW COMMENTS ON THE PRELIminary Draft OF THE RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE PROPOSED FOR THE FEDERAL COURTS, 10 Fla. L. J. 233 (1936).

Pike, NEW FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 12 Calif. S. B. J. 192 and 223 (1937).

Pike, OBJECTIONS TO PLEADINGS UNDER THE NEW FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 47 Yale L. J. 50 (1937). Shulman and Jaegerman, SOME JURISDICTIONAL LIMITATIONS ON FEDERAL PROCEDURE, 45 Yale L. J. 393 (1936). Shuman [Appeal and Record on Appeal in California and in the Preliminary Draft Compared], 61 A. B. A. Reports 492 (1936).

Spalding, THE EFFECT OF NEW RULES ON THE LAW OF EVIDENCE, 61 A. B. A. Reports 487 (1936).

Stone, THE RECORD ON APPEAL IN CIVIL CASES, 23 Va. L. Rev. 766 (1937).

Sunderland, CHARACTER AND EXTENT OF THE RULE-MAKING

POWER GRANTED U. S. SUPREME COURT AND METHODS OF EFFECTIVE EXERCISE, 21 A. B. A. J. 404 (1935). Sunderland, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW IN CASES WHERE JURIES ARE WAIVED, 4 U. of Chi. L. Rev. 218 (1937).

Sunderland, THE GRANT OF RULE-MAKING POWER TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 32 Mich. L. Rev. 1116 (1934).

Tolman, HISTORICAL BEGINNINGS OF PROCEDURAL REFORM, ETC., 22 A. B. A. J. 783.

Tolman, THE ORIGIN OF THE CONFORMITY IDEA, ITS DEVELOPMENT, THE FAILURE OF THE EXPERIMENT, ETC., 23 A. B. A. J. 971 (1937).

Tolman, THE PROPOSED RULES OF FEDERAL PRACTICE, ANN. REP'T ILL. S. B. A. (1937), p. 158.

Van Cott and Ray, FEDERAL PROCEDURE UNDER THE PROPOSED NEW RULES, 6 Utah Bar Bull. 28 (1936).

Wickes, THE NEW RULE-MAKING POWER OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, 13 Tex. L. Rev. 1 (1934).

Wigmore, A CRITIQUE OF THE FEDERAL COURT RULES DRAFT, ETC., 22 A. B. A. J. 811 (1936).

CHANGES IN FEDERAL PRACTICE RECOMMENDED, 20 A. B. A. J. 103 (1934).

COMMITTEE SUBMITS ANOTHER DRAFT OF RULES TO GOVERN CIVIL ACTIONS IN FEDERAL COURTS, 4 U. S. L. Week 1234, 1264 (1937).

NEW RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR FEDERAL TRIAL COURTS, 5 U. S. L. Week 457, 480 (1938).

OPEN FORUM DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR FEDERAL COURTS, ETC. [American Bar Association Assembly, Boston, 1936] 22 A.B. A.J.682 (1936). Verbatim Transcript, 61 A. B. A. Reports 86 (1936). OPEN FORUM DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE [American Bar Association Judicial Section, Kansas City, 1937], 23 A. B. A. J. 965 (1937).

PROPOSED RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 3 U. S. L. Week 1010, 1040 (1936).

RECENT TRENDS IN JOINDER OF PARTIES, CAUSES, AND COUNTERCLAIMS, 37 Col. L. Rev. 462 (1937).

REPORT OF COMMITTEE ON FEDERAL COURT RULES (DISTRICT OF UTAH), 6 Utah Bar Bull. 182.

REPORTS OF THE FEDERAL RULES COMMITTEE FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS: FIRST REPORT, 20 Mass. L. Q. (Aug. 1935) 14; SECOND REPORT, 21 Mass. L. Q. (April 1936) 25; THIRD REPORT, 21 Mass. L. Q. (Oct. 1936) 49.

RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR DISTRICT COURTS, 9 N. Y. St. Bar. Assn. Bull. 268.

SUPREME COURT ADOPTS RULES FOR CIVIL PROCEDURE IN

FEDERAL DISTRICT COURTS, 24 A. B. A. J. 97 (1938). SUPREME COURT RULES IN LAW CASES, 20 A. B. A. J. 395 (1934).

THE NATIONWIDE STUDY IN CONNECTION WITH RULES OF COURT, ETC., 20 Mass. L. Q. 41-44 (Feb. 1935).

TRIAL SPECIAL VERDICT-NECESSITY OF FINDINGS On all MATERIAL ISSUES, 15 Texas L. Rev. 396 (1937).

UNIFORM FEDERAL PROCEDURE, 24 A. B. A. J. 132 (1938).

О