viii People v. Evanuk ex rel. Bryant v. Zim merman (N. Y.) 909 v. Minister of Finance (Can.) 794 Peytavin Planting Co., Grace Smyth, Boyd v. (Iowa) 1381 Snodgrass, Stoddard v. (Or.) 1160 Piper, Mile Wide Copper Co. Southern Can Co. v. Sachs .. V. (Ariz.) 1359 Speight v. Simonsen (Iowa) 1141 (Ky.) 803 (Mass.) 1280 Spokane Valley Growers' Union, Northern P. R. Co. v. (Wash.) 194 Portsmouth v. Mitchell Mfg. Spring v. Leahy (Mass.) 1203 Co. (Ohio) 961 Stafford, Barnesville v. (Ga.) 1045 Q. Stafford-Smith Co., Yellow Cab Co. v. (Ill.) 1173 State v. Brownfield (La.) 475 Quaker Maid, Danville v! ... (Ky.) 590 ex rel. Hegewald, Charles Hegewald Co. v. (Ind.) 775 R. v. Devot rel. Mutual Tank Line Co. v. Gunder ex rel. Hegewald, Hegewald (Charles) Co. rel. West Virginia ex rel. Nenzel v. Second Judicial Dist. Ct. (Nev.) 1331 (S. D.) 397 (Ind.) 775 552 (N. Y.) 512 v. Tinnin (Utah) 46 Richardson, Lawley v. .... Roberts, Reynolds v. (Okla.) (Kan.) Rosenthal, Paccos v. Royal Indemnity Co., State ex rel. West Virginia Sand & Gravel Co. (Wash.) (Wash.) 1263 Steber v. Norris (Wis.) 501 Co. Stevens, Moore v. Stephens v. Blackwood Lumber Stevens (Britton) Motors Co., (N. C.) 426 (Fla.) 1127 Wall v. (Mass.) 647 Stewart Dry Goods Co., Fideli S. ty & C. Co. v. (Ky.) 318 Stoddard v. Snodgrass (Or.) 1160 Stone (J. D.) & Co., Leicht Benson Realty & Schlesinger v. Wisconsin (S. C.) 971 (U. S.) 1224 Constr. Corp. v. Sullivan, McCullough v. .. (Va.) 1100 (N. J.) 928 Scott, Terre Haute, I. & E. Superior Ct., Hamblin v. (Cal.) 1509 Traction Co. v. (Ind.) 1029 Second Judicial Dist. Ct., State T. ex rel. Nenzel validity. (Md., 131 Atl. 332.) depriving corporation of defense of usury 1. A corporation is not unconstitutionally deprived of the equal protection of the laws by a statute depriving it of the defense of usury which is accorded to individual borrowers. [See annotation on this question beginning on page 18.] - Estoppel, § 68 corporations stockholder guarantor right to claim individual rights. 2. A stockholder who becomes a guarantor for the obligation of the corporation will not ordinarily be heard to deny this status, and claim that a contract made in the name of the corporation, and within its competency, and as its corporate act, was not a corporate, but his own individual, act, because the corporation had ceased to exist, for the reason that he was, at the time of the apparent corporate act, the sole owner of the corporate stock. Corporations, § 16 when corporate form disregarded. 3. The rule that the form of a corporate entity may be disregarded where the ownership of all of its cor43 A.L.R.-1. |