Page images
PDF
EPUB

2. Section C.1. of Appendix D is amended to read as follows:

C. Procedures for review of certain construction permits for production or utilization facilities issued prior to January 1, 1970, for which operating licenses or notice of opportunity for hearing on the operating license application have not been issued.

1. Each holder of a permit to construct a production or utilization facility of the type described in section A.1 issued prior to January 1, 1970, for which neither an operating license nor a notice of opportunity for hearing on the operating license application had been issued prior to September 9, 1971, shall submit the appropriate number of copies of an environmental report as specified in sections A.1-4 of this Appendix as soon as possible, but no later than sixty (60) days after September 9, 1971, or such later date as may be approved by the Commission upon good cause shown. If an environmental report had been submitted prior to September 9, 1971, a supplement to that report, covering the matters described in sections A.1-4 to the extent not previously covered, may be submitted in lieu of a new environmental report.

3. A footnote 11 is added to section D.1. of Appendix D following the word "date" to read as follows:

"In proceedings in which an applicant's environmental report, rather than a draft detailed statement, was circulated by the Commission, that environmental report shall be deemed a draft detailed statement for the purposes of this paragraph.

4. Sections E.1 and E.3 of Appendix D are amended to read as follows:

E. Consideration of suspension of certain permits and licenses pending NEPA Environmental Review.

1. In regard to (a) proceedings subject to Section B other than those in which a hearing on an operating license application has commenced, (b) proceedings subject to section C involving nuclear power reactors and testing facilities," and (c) proceedings in which the Commission estimates that construction under a permit will not be completed by January 1, 1972, the Commission will consider and determine, in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 3 and 4 of this section E, whether the permit or license should be suspended, in whole or in part, pending completion of the NEPA environmental review specified in those sections.

*

3. Each holder of a permit or license subject to paragraph 1 of this section E shall furnish to the Commission, before 40 days after September 9, 1971 or such later date as may be approved by the Commission upon good cause shown, a written statement of any reasons, with supporting factual submission, why, with reference to the criteria in paragraph 2, the permit or license should not be suspended, in whole or in part, pending completion of the NEPA environmental review specified in sections B, C, or D. Such documents will be publicly available and any interested person may submit comments thereon to the Commission.

(Sec. 102, 83 Stat. 853; secs. 3, 161; 68 Stat. 922, 948, as amended; 42 U.S.C. 2013, 2201)

Dated at Germantown, Md., this 24th day of September 1971.
For the Atomic Energy Commission.

[graphic]

W. B. McCOOL, Secretary of the Commission.

12 Fuel reprocessing plants have been excluded since only one such plant is subject to section C and its construction is complete.

22

[FR Doc. 71--14353 Filed 9–29–71; 8:47 a.m.]

U.S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION, DIVISION OF RADIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

LIST OF NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR CASES COVERED BY THE NEW APPENDIX D, PART 50-INTERIM STATEMENT OF GENERAL POLICY AND PROCEDURES: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT OF 1969 (PUBLIC LAW 91-190)

September 22, 1971

[Attached is a list of nuclear power reactor cases under Sections A, B, C, D and E on the new revised Appendix D, Part 50, Interim Statement of General Policy and Procedures: Implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (Public Law 91–190).]

Provisional operating licenses:

1. Indian Point 1..

2. Fermi 1.

3. Peach Bottom 1.

4. San Onofre 1.

5. Genoa Nuclear Power 1

(LaCrosse).

6. Haddam Neck....

7. Oyster Creek. 8. Nine Mile Point. 9. Dresden 2. 10. Ginna

Construction permits: 2

1. LaSalle 1.

2. LaSalle 2.
3. Verplanck 1.

4. Verplanck 2.

5. Malibu..

6. Waterford 3.

7. Waterford 4.

8. Bell Station.

9. Bailly Station. 10. Susquehanna 1...

11. Susquehanna 2. 12. Seabrook 1.

13. Aguirre...

14. North Anna 3.

15. North Anna 4.

16. Hatch 2.

17. Hutchinson Island 2..

18. Summer 1.

19. Hanford 2.

20. Mendocino 1.

21. Mendocino 2..

22. Harris Unit 1.

23. Harris Unit 2. 24. Harris Unit 3..

25. Harris Unit 4.

[blocks in formation]
[graphic]

LaSalle County, Ill.

Do.

Westchester County, N.Y.

Do.

City of Los Angeles, Department of Water and Corral Canyon, Calif. (inactive).

[graphic][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][subsumed][merged small][subsumed][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][subsumed][merged small][subsumed][merged small]
[graphic]
[graphic]
[graphic]

Wake County, N.C.

Do.

Do.

Do.

See footnotes at end of table, p. 231.

B. CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND OPERATING LICENSES ISSUED BETWEEN JAN, 1, 1970, AND SEPT. 9, 1971

[merged small][merged small][graphic][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][merged small][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][merged small][merged small][graphic][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][merged small][subsumed][subsumed][merged small]

CONSTRUCTION PERMITS FOR PRODUCTION OR UTILIZATION FACILITIES ISSUED PRIOR TO JAN. 1, 1970, FOR WHICH OPERATING LICENSES HAVE NOT BEEN ISSUED

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][merged small][merged small][merged small][graphic][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][graphic][merged small][merged small][merged small]

D. PENDING HEARINGS OR PROCEEDINGS TO BE NOTICED IN THE NEAR FUTURE

[graphic][subsumed][merged small][merged small][merged small][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][graphic][merged small][merged small][merged small]

D. PENDING HEARINGS OR PROCEEDINGS TO BE NOTICED IN THE NEAR FUTURE-Continued

Construction permits-Continued

12. Limerick 1.
13. Limerick 2.
14. Forked River.
15. San Onofre 2.
16. San Onofre 3.
17. Arkansas 2.
18. Watts Bar 1.
19. Watts Bar 2..
Operating licenses:
1 Palisades...

2. Indian Point 2.
3. Vermont Yankee..
4. Quad Cities 1.

5. Quad Cities 2.

6. Point Beach 2.

7. Pilgrim.
8 Oconee 1
9. Oconee 2..
10. Oconee 3.
11. Surry 1.
12. Surry 2.
13. Maine Yankee.
14. Turkey Point 3.
15. Turkey Point 4.
16. Fort St. Vrain.
17. Calvert Cliffs 1.
18. Calvert Cliffs 2.
19. Three Mile Island
20. Browns Ferry 1.
21. Browns Ferry 2.

[blocks in formation]
[graphic]

South Haven, Mich.
Indian Point, N. Y.
Vernon, Vt.
Cordova, Ill.
Do.

Two Creeks, Wis.
Plymouth, Mass.
Seneca, S.C.
Do.

[graphic]

Do.

Gravel Neck, Va.

[graphic]

Wiscasset, Maine
Turkey Point, Fla.
Do
Platteville, Colo.
Lusby, Md.
Do.

Middletown, Pa.
Decatur, Ala.

Do.

Do.

E. CONSIDERATION OF SUSPENSION OF CERTAIN PERMITS AND LICENSES PENDING

[merged small][merged small][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][merged small][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][merged small][merged small][graphic][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][ocr errors]

E. CONSIDERATION OF SUSPENSION OF CERTAIN PERMITS AND LICENSES PENDING
NEPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW—Continued

[merged small][merged small][merged small][graphic][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][merged small]

NOTE TO EDITORS AND CORRESPONDENTS

Following is a brief status report on the US. civilian nuclear power program as of September 30, 1971:

During the first three quarters of this year, electric utilities made known plans for 24 nuclear power generating units with a total capacity of 24,560,000 kilowatts to be located at 14 power stations. Reactor suppliers were selected for 17 of these units and for one announced in 1967.

In the first three quarters of 1970, utilities made known plans for 13 nuclear power generating units with a total capacity of 13,407,000 kilowatts to be located at nine power stations. Reactor suppliers have been selected for these plants and for one announced in 1967.

Status of nuclear power generating units, as of Sept. 30, 1971

[graphic]
[graphic]
[graphic]

22 operable_

55 under construction_...

49 planned (reactors ordered)

Total (126).

104, 260, 800

[graphic]

Enclosed for your information is a map of the United States showing the location of all present and proposed civilian nuclear power generating units for which reactor suppliers have been selected. October 18, 1971.

« PreviousContinue »