Privacy: The Collection, Use, and Computerization of Personal Data : Joint Hearings Before the Ad Hoc Subcommittee on Privacy and Information Systems of the Committee on Government Operations and the Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-third Congress, Second Session ... June 18, 19, and 20, 1974
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Government Operations. Ad Hoc Subcommittee on Privacy and Information Systems
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1974 - 337 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abuse action activities administrative agencies allow Amendment American application arrest assistance authority become believe bill Bureau citizens civil Code collection Committee communication concern confidential Congress constitutional consumer contained court Credit Reporting criminal criminal justice data banks decision Defense Department discharge disclosure dossiers effect employee established executive existence fact Federal files freedom give Government hearings House important individual interest invasion involved issue legislation limited maintained matter means ment necessary obtained Office Operations organizations political possible practices present President problem procedures proposed protect question reason received records regulations relating representatives request response result right to privacy rules Secretary Senate Service social society Speaker statement supra tax returns tion tort United violation
Page 1518 - ... (6) personnel and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy ; (7) Investigatory files compiled for law enforcement purposes except to the extent available by law to a party other than an agency...
Page 1584 - To redress the deprivation, under color of any State law, statute, ordinance, regulation, custom or usage, of any right, privilege or immunity secured by the Constitution of the United States...
Page 1533 - States courts of any Territory or other place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, to enjoin such acts or practices, and upon a proper showing a permanent or temporary injunction or restraining order shall be granted without bond.
Page 1517 - ... (B) statements of the general course and method by which its functions are channeled and determined, including the nature and requirements of all formal and informal procedures available; (C) rules of procedure, descriptions of forms available or the places at which forms may be obtained and instructions as to the scope and contents of all papers, reports, or examinations; (D) substantive rules of general applicability adopted as authorized by law, and statements of general policy or interpretations...
Page 1520 - Subject to published rules of the agency and within its powers, employees presiding at hearings may — (1) administer oaths and affirmations; (2) issue subpenas authorized by law; (3) rule on offers of proof and receive relevant evidence; (4) take depositions or have depositions taken when the ends of justice would be served...
Page 2004 - Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the Government's purposes are beneficent. Men born to freedom are naturally alert to repel invasion of their liberty by evil-minded rulers. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding.
Page 1520 - Every party shall have the right to present his case or defense by oral or documentary evidence, to submit rebuttal evidence, and to conduct such cross-examination as may be required for a full and true disclosure of the facts.
Page 1573 - Every person who having been summoned as a witness by the authority of either House of Congress to give testimony or to produce papers upon any matter under inquiry before either House...
Page 1780 - It is cardinal with us that the custody, care and nurture of the child reside first in the parents, whose primary function and freedom include preparation for obligations the state can neither supply nor hinder.
Page 1779 - Under the doctrine of Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 US 390, we think it entirely plain that the Act of 1922 unreasonably interferes with the liberty of parents and guardians to direct the upbringing and education of children under their control.