Greeks and Barbarians
How did the Greeks view foreign peoples? This book considers what the Greeks thought of foreigners and their religions, cultures and politics, and what these beliefs and opinions reveal about the Greeks.
The Greeks were occasionally intrigued by the customs and religions of the many different peoples with whom they came into contact; more often they were disdainful or dismissive, tending to regard non-Greeks as at best inferior, and at worst as candidates for conquest and enslavement. Facing up to this less attractive aspect of the classical tradition is vital, Thomas Harrison argues, to seeing both what the ancient world was really like and the full nature of its legacy in the modern. In this book he brings together outstanding European and American scholarship to show the difference and complexity of Greek representations of foreign peoples - or barbarians, as the Greeks called them - and how these representations changed over time.
The book looks first at the main sources: the Histories of Herodotus, Greek tragedy, and Athenian art. Part II examines how the Greeks distinguished themselves from barbarians through myth, language and religion. Part III considers Greek representations of two different barbarian peoples - the allegedly decadent and effeminate Persians, and the Egyptians, proverbial for their religious wisdom. In part IV three chapters trace the development of the Greek-barbarian antithesis in later history: in nineteenth-century scholarship, in Byzantine and modern Greece, and in western intellectual history.
Of the twelve chapters six are published in English for the first time. The editor has provided an extensive general introduction, as well as introductions to the parts. The book contains two maps, a guide to further reading and an intellectual chronology. All passages of ancient languages are translated, and difficult terms are explained.
Results 1-3 of 27
Lurid stories , for example , of the excessive influence and cruelty of Persian royal women are dismissed as motivated by the misogyny of Greek authors , yet the same stories are used as the basis for painting a sometimes implausibly ...
Other authors ( such as Clearchus ) cited this trait as characteristic of Persian royalty ( cf. XII , 528 d ; 539 b ; 545 d and f ) . The abundance and variety of dishes at the king's table were well known to classical and Hellenistic ...
Similarly , ancient authors were not in agreement over the military virtues of Sardanapalus . Some ( Duris and others ) turned him into the archetype of the weak and cowardly king , simply because of his effeminate way of life ...
What people are saying - Write a review
General Introduction I
3 the Staatliche Kunstsammlungen Dresden fig 4 the Museum
of Fine Arts Boston fig 5 the Archaeological Institute of
15 other sections not shown