Greeks and Barbarians
How did the Greeks view foreign peoples? This book considers what the Greeks thought of foreigners and their religions, cultures and politics, and what these beliefs and opinions reveal about the Greeks.
The Greeks were occasionally intrigued by the customs and religions of the many different peoples with whom they came into contact; more often they were disdainful or dismissive, tending to regard non-Greeks as at best inferior, and at worst as candidates for conquest and enslavement. Facing up to this less attractive aspect of the classical tradition is vital, Thomas Harrison argues, to seeing both what the ancient world was really like and the full nature of its legacy in the modern. In this book he brings together outstanding European and American scholarship to show the difference and complexity of Greek representations of foreign peoples - or barbarians, as the Greeks called them - and how these representations changed over time.
The book looks first at the main sources: the Histories of Herodotus, Greek tragedy, and Athenian art. Part II examines how the Greeks distinguished themselves from barbarians through myth, language and religion. Part III considers Greek representations of two different barbarian peoples - the allegedly decadent and effeminate Persians, and the Egyptians, proverbial for their religious wisdom. In part IV three chapters trace the development of the Greek-barbarian antithesis in later history: in nineteenth-century scholarship, in Byzantine and modern Greece, and in western intellectual history.
Of the twelve chapters six are published in English for the first time. The editor has provided an extensive general introduction, as well as introductions to the parts. The book contains two maps, a guide to further reading and an intellectual chronology. All passages of ancient languages are translated, and difficult terms are explained.
Results 1-3 of 28
III Persia's weakness in the fourth century is a theme tirelessly taken up by the
Athenian orator Isocrates , the eulogist of Panhellenism and the war against the
Great King . It is to be found again , developed with a notable complacency , in
True , Isocrates and Xenophon lay particular emphasis on the catastrophic
development supposedly undergone by the empire in the fourth century : the
former dwelling on the seccessions of the countries that had been conquered ,
the latter ...
The opposing sides in this dispute have tended to mass round the symbolic
figures of Demosthenes and Isocrates ; but the issue has not been allowed to
remain one of Greek unity versus Greek particularism . A careful examination to
of what ...
What people are saying - Write a review
General Introduction I
3 the Staatliche Kunstsammlungen Dresden fig 4 the Museum
of Fine Arts Boston fig 5 the Archaeological Institute of
15 other sections not shown