Greeks and BarbariansHow did the Greeks view foreign peoples? This book considers what the Greeks thought of foreigners and their religions, cultures and politics, and what these beliefs and opinions reveal about the Greeks. The Greeks were occasionally intrigued by the customs and religions of the many different peoples with whom they came into contact; more often they were disdainful or dismissive, tending to regard non-Greeks as at best inferior, and at worst as candidates for conquest and enslavement. Facing up to this less attractive aspect of the classical tradition is vital, Thomas Harrison argues, to seeing both what the ancient world was really like and the full nature of its legacy in the modern. In this book he brings together outstanding European and American scholarship to show the difference and complexity of Greek representations of foreign peoples - or barbarians, as the Greeks called them - and how these representations changed over time.The book looks first at the main sources: the Histories of Herodotus, Greek tragedy, and Athenian art. Part II examines how the Greeks distinguished themselves from barbarians through myth, language and religion. Part III considers Greek representations of two different barbarian peoples - the allegedly decadent and effeminate Persians, and the Egyptians, proverbial for their religious wisdom. In part IV three chapters trace the development of the Greek-barbarian antithesis in later history: in nineteenth-century scholarship, in Byzantine and modern Greece, and in western intellectual history.Of the twelve chapters six are published in English for the first time. The editor has provided an extensive general introduction, as well as introductions to the parts. The book contains two maps, a guide to further reading and an intellectual chronology. All passages of ancient languages are translated, and difficult terms are explained. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 50
Page 19
3 In his ' Battle Narrative and Politics in Aeschylus ' Persae ' ( Ch . 2 ) , Simon
Goldhill – following on from his earlier work emphasising the essentially civic
nature of Greek drama ' 4 – instead places the play ' s representation of the
Persians in ...
3 In his ' Battle Narrative and Politics in Aeschylus ' Persae ' ( Ch . 2 ) , Simon
Goldhill – following on from his earlier work emphasising the essentially civic
nature of Greek drama ' 4 – instead places the play ' s representation of the
Persians in ...
Page 50
2 Battle Narrative and Politics in Aeschylus ' Persaet SIMON GOLDHILL In “ The
Great Dionysia and civic ideology ' , I argued that the Festival of the Great
Dionysia needed to be seen in the context of fifth - century Athenian culture and
that the ...
2 Battle Narrative and Politics in Aeschylus ' Persaet SIMON GOLDHILL In “ The
Great Dionysia and civic ideology ' , I argued that the Festival of the Great
Dionysia needed to be seen in the context of fifth - century Athenian culture and
that the ...
Page 143
Bernal uses an Athenian text , Aeschylus ' Suppliants , a play about the arrival of
Danaus and his fifty daughters from Egypt to Argos , as one of the linchpins of his
argument . In this play a decidedly Egyptianized and black Danaus and his fifty ...
Bernal uses an Athenian text , Aeschylus ' Suppliants , a play about the arrival of
Danaus and his fifty daughters from Egypt to Argos , as one of the linchpins of his
argument . In this play a decidedly Egyptianized and black Danaus and his fifty ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
General Introduction | 1 |
3 the Staatliche Kunstsammlungen Dresden fig 4 the Museum | 3 |
of Fine Arts Boston fig 5 the Archaeological Institute of | 10 |
Copyright | |
14 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
according Aeschylus ancient appears argument Asia Athenian Athens authors Barbarian become Cadmus called century classical common concept context contrast course culture customs dialect discussion divine early Egypt Egyptian empire especially ethnic Euripides evidence example existence fact fifth foreign further give gods Greece Greek Hall hand Hellenic Herodotus human idea identity important instance interest interpretation Isocrates Italy king land language later less linguistic matriarchy means mentioned myth nature never nomoi observed opposition oriental origin Paris particular period Persian Persian Wars Phoenician Plato play political possible practice present problem question reason refer regard relations religion Roman rule Scythians seems seen shows society sources speak speech story theory thought tradition tragedy turn University various whole women writing