...possession of another family member, evidence shall be submitted that the petitioning family member did not know or have reason to know that the property was likely to be used in the act which resulted in the seizure. (b) Petitioner holding chattel mortgage...

...possession of another family member, evidence shall be submitted that the petitioning family member did not know or have reason to know that the property was likely to be used' in the act which resulted in the seizure. (b) Petitioner holding chattel mortgage...

...possession of another family member, evidence shall be submitted that the petitioning family member did not know or have reason to know that the property was likely to be used in the act which resulted in the seizure. (b) Petitioner holding chattel mortgage...

...of hazardous substances; and (8) conducted "all appropriate inquiry" with regard to the property and did not know or have reason to know that the property was or could be contaminated by one or more hazardous substances from other real property not owned by...

...definition of "contractual relationship" in §101(35) of CERCLA, apply only to owners, while HR 1300 extends these protections to owners and operators....complied with the "due diligence" requirements. In HR 1 300, there is no definition for "contractual relationship," and, under new § I(.)7(b)(5), a current...

...performed an appropriate inquiry as described in § 101(35) before buying the property, to demonstrate that they did not know or have reason to know that the property was contaminated when they bought it. We are concerned with HR 2580's approach towards contiguous landowners. We prefer...

...all appropriate inquiry within the meaning of section 10K35HB) with respect to the property; and (II) did not know or have reason to know that the property was or could be contaminated by a release or threatened release of one or more hazardous substances from...

...remove from liability purchasers of real estate who, among other things, at the time of the purchase did not know or have reason to know that, the property was contaminated. It is my understanding that EPA has rarely, if ever, officially determined that a purchaser of contaminated...

...within the meaning of section 101(35)(B) [42 USC 9601(35)(B)] with respect to the property; and (II) did not know or have reason to know that the property was or could be contaminated by a release or threatened release of one or more hazardous substances from...

...appropriate inquiry within the meaning of section 101(35)(B) with respect to the property; and (II) did not know or have reason to know that the property was or could be contaminated by a release or threatened release of one or more hazardous substances from...