...significance as determined by the Federal, State, or local officials having jurisdiction thereof ... as so determined by such officials unless (1) there...all possible planning to minimize harm to such park . . . ." (Emphasis added.) Even the Secretary admits that he has failed to make formal findings about...

...State, or local significance as so determined by such officials (hereafter "Section 4(f) land") only if: (1) There is no feasible and prudent alternative to...Includes all possible planning to minimize harm to the section 4(f) land resulting from such use. c. Section 470f, title 16, United States Code * provides...

...refuge of national. State, or local significance as determined by the Federal, State, or local officials having jurisdiction thereof, or any land from an historic site of national. State, or local significance; (2) Any matter falling under section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (16 USC...

...refuge of national. State, or local significance as determined by the Federal, State, or local officials having jurisdiction thereof, or any land from an historic site of national. State, or local significance; (2) Any matter falling under section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (16 USC...

...the application. The section 4Ш determination shall document that: 49 CFR Ch. II (10-1-98 Edition) (1) There is no feasible and prudent alternative to the use of such land; and (ii) The project includes all planning to minimize harm resulting from such use. (5) Historic preservation....

...shall be submitted together with the application. The section 4(f) determination shall document that: (1) There is no feasible and prudent alternative to the use of such land: and (ii) The project includes all planning to minimize harm resulting from suet use. (5) Historic preservation....

...be submitted together with the application. The section 4(f) determination shall document that: (i) There is no feasible and prudent alternative to the use of such land; and (ii) The project includes all planning to minimize harm resulting from such use. (5) Historic preservation....

...be submitted together with the application. The section 4(f) determination shall document that: (i) There is no feasible and prudent alternative to the use of such land; and (ii) The project includes all planning to minimize harm resulting from such use. (5) Historic preservation....

...determined by the Federal, State or local official having jurisdiction thereof; or any land from a historic site of national. State or local significance as so determined by such official. The purpose of the section 4(f) statement is also to support a determination that the proposed...

...recreation area, historic site, or fish and wildlife conservation area unless (1) there is no feasible alternative to the use of such land, and (2) such program includes all possible planning to minimize any harm to such park, area, or site resulting from such use." The Bureau of the Budget has advised...