« PreviousContinue »
given, and 22 or 23 institutions were aided to develop more laboratory research space. That has proved an absolute godsend to those institutions, but there are now many that need such facilities, and among them are some of the best rheumatic fever workers in the country.
Dr. WRIGHT. Are there any other questions before we proceed with the question of hypertension?
Mr. MOULDER. Mr. Chairman?
Mr. MOULDER. Dr. Wright, you made a statement awhile ago that one out of each two deaths resulted from heart disease. Do you mean all types of deaths ?
Dr. WRIGHT. All deaths. Mr. MOULDER. Not only heart disease, but all deaths? Dr. WRIGHT. Yes, sir. For example, in New York State 52 percent of the people who died last year died of heart disease, using the definition which I originally gave, in a broad sense.
The CHAIRMAN. Any other questions, gentlemen?
I would like to ask you this, Dr. Jones: Have you any thought to express as to how rheumatic heart disease can be prevented ?
Dr. Jones. I did not understand the first part of the question, sir.
The CHAIRMAN. Have you any suggestion to make as to how rheumatic heart disease can be prevented or diminished?
Dr. JoNEs. I think at the present time the use of prevention methods, particularly the early treatment of streptococcal infections and controlling epidemics of streptococcal infections—is probably the one and only immediate weapon of any importance that we have. I do not think it will be a final answer or a permanent one; but that is what we have now. I think the Heart Association and allied efforts to get that applied is perhaps the most important phase, from a practical point of view, at present, toward preventing or minimizing rheumatic heart disease.
The CHAIRMAN. I have noticed that at times part of the advertising conducted by life-insurance companies is such that they have given advice with respect to certain diseases, which they considered would be helpful to the general public in preventing the particular disease to which the advertisement was directed at the time. Is there anything that can be done to advise or inform the public as to the situations that can create or would be likely to create rheumatic heart disease; and which, by proper advice, could be prevented?
Dr. JONES. Well, I think that now the only preventive knowledge that we have is on these sulfa drugs or the antibiotics; that is, of any great importance.
The life insurance educational programs could certainly help in utilizing that. I think they are entertaining such a program.
Not only that, but I think that the continual attempts to bring these knowledges to the medical profession are important. Last year when the council of rheumatic fever of the Heart Association met, they issued a statement advocating a daily prophylaxis and early treatment of the streptococcal infections with penicillin. That statement appeared in about 12 or 15 of the officials organs of the professional groups; a great many of them medical; one social service; a hospital association; and so forth.
- I think that the Heart Association has as one of its very important responsibilities this type of an educational program. It is mentioned, I believe, in nearly all the annual meetings, the open meetings of the Heart Association, in various parts of the country, which are held for not only physicians but also the lay boards and the general public. So it is beginning to get a very wide range of educational coverage. And I hope that this will help tremendously in an increasing way until our knowledge is better than it is now.
The CHAIRMAN. Frequently we get valuable information as to what has been done and what can be done with respect to certain diseases through the campaigns which are conducted by different organizations for subscriptions to support their work. Aside from that type of information which is given to the public, is there any way, in your opinion, which would suggest a general dissemination of information to the public? If so, whose duty would it be or who could best do that, in your opinion?
Dr. JONES. Well, I think that the American Heart Association, as the one voluntary national health agency interested in this field, has this as a primary obligation, and is trying to fulfill it to the very best of its advantage. One of the most important features of such a program is professional education, because there is no question but that to be effective this must come to the attention of every physician, and he must be urged to use it in his daily taking care of individuals.
I do not know of any appreciable way in which this could be much more effective than it is at the present time, except that I think that it might be concentrated on in a somewhat wider way; particularly with regard to the professional aspects of it.
I think that practically every medical group in the country in the past several years has had it presented to them, and that this is very helpful.
Also, I would believe that the National Heart Institute is very desirous of playing a role in this and that it has been very helpful.
Then there is, for instance, the Heart Bulletin, a magazine which goes to a number of States and every physician in the States through sponsorship of health departments, medical societies, and heart associations. It has had a number of articles on this matter. And I think the constant channeling of information to media of communication such as radio, television, newspapers, and to professional groups, is presently going on at a fairly intensive level.
I think some of the officers of the Heart Association could speak to that. Mr. Betts, the executive director of the Heart Association, is here. He has that as one of his responsibilities. Perhaps he would like to speak to it.
The CHAIRMAN. We will undoubtedly hear later from Mr. Betts. Do you prefer that we have a reply at the present time, Dr. Wright, or when he is on the program subsequently to speak at some length
? Dr. WRIGHT. Well, sir, the American Heart Association has had an active interest in education through leading publications, and in the last year more than 50 of the leading magazine publications of the country have caried extremely informative articles on the problems of heart disease. Many thousands of statements and educational programs have been conducted over radio and television. In order to encourage this the American Heart Association has set up what is
known as the Blakeslee Award for the outstanding accurate informar tive writing in newspapers, magazines, and so on or in a television or radio production in the media of communication, shall we say of each year, for the purpose of encouraging just exactly what I think you are asking about. We are doing everything we can in our power to see that this is encouraged.
Dr. ANDRUS. Dr. Wright, in anticipation of this question I had a conversation with Mr. Betts, who is beside me here. He tells me that in addition to the large sums which are spent by the State heart associations in public education, 10 cents out of every dollar which comes to the national organization is used to disseminate lay information with regard to heart disease and its control.
The CHAIRMAN. Well, my question originated with the thought as to how much information of a lay character is possible, and how much should be from the standpoint of the physician. I rather gathered from what was said by Dr. Jones that it was very largely a matter which had to be handled through the physician, rather than by public dissemination of information. Is that so; or is there a place in the picture for public dissemination of information!
Dr. ANDRUS. I think there is a very large place for dissemination of well-founded information to the public. As you are aware, sir, physicians have difficulty in expressing themselves in lay terms. With the assistance of good lay writers I think that difficulty is being
To say the least, the Heart Association and those in the field are awakening to the importance of disseminating information to the public; accurate information and information which will allay fear and provide accurate hope in the future.
The CHAIRMAN. What I had in mind was whether the situation is such that the dissemination of information to the public would materially reduce the number of those suffering with rheumatic heart conditions, or whether it is entirely a matter of treatment after they have it. Is there anything that can be done from a public standpoint in bringing home to them what, if anything, has a tendency to lead to rheumatic conditions, and, therefore, should be avoided? That is a layman's question.
Dr. WRIGHT. Will you answer that, Doctor?
Dr. ANDRUS. I think, as Dr. Jones has pointed out, that insofar as rheumatic fever is a consequence of an infection, the advice to the public to consult their physicians when they have sore throats is a sound means of prevention. I think that the insidious nature of the onset of rheumatic fever in so large a proportion of the incidence, as Dr. Jones has emphasized, would make it difficult for the layman to recognize the need.
Does that answer your question?
Dr. JoNEs. May I say, sir, in addition, that in some areas of the country—and we hope this will increase more and more-there are movements to develop programs which will help protect the identified rheumatic fever individual. And, in addition to that, efforts on a communitywide basis would help control streptococcal epidemics. For instance, in Youngstown, Ohio, there is a study in which all children with respiratory infections in the schools of Youngstown are seen by a physician and nurse, and cultures are taken to see if they have the streptococcus in their throat. They are promptly treated if this turns out to be true. This is a very complicated and difficult problem, but cooperation between schools and varied agencies in the community, and private physicians and so forth, unquestionably is probably more important than the individual parent or family, in view of the fact that so much of the streptococcal infection is quiet and does not cause symptoms.
In Newton, Mass., in a demonstration program of the Public Health Service, there was a very beautiful communitywide program conducted with the cooperation of the physicians of that community to see that every known rheumatic got prophylaxis daily, and that streptococcal disease, wherever it appeared in the community, was promptly treated.
I am sure that that will increase, and it is one of the very important efforts which I think will result in a diminution of this health problem.
The CHAIRMAN. What I am interested in, of course, is our particular opportunity for service in the Congress. Is there any definite opinion with respect to what Congress could or should do through public agencies by giving authority to them that they do not have at the present time, or to better utilize what authority they do have? Or, is it, instead of a Federal proposition, a State proposition, or a local proposition? In other words, in what way, if any, by legislation would it be possible for Congress, a State legislature, or a local governing body to be helpful in this particular matter?
Dr. JONES. Well, as the present research pattern in health is organized I think it unequivocally is true that the funds for research which are presently going to the Heart Institute and other institutes of health are very important. I would like to say that in approaching any one of these health problems if you support basic work you may surprisingly find that your research is helpful to a number of disease entities and not necessarily the one you are particularly interested in. That is a very important feature of research support, and it is vitally essential that funds for research not specified to rheumatic fever particularly but to the Heart Institute, and generalgrants program of the Public Health Service, be provided. That is one of the most important features in the advance of health knowledge throughout the country.
I would hope, also, that the Heart Association as a voluntary agency would continue to exert its efforts to raise funds for research, because this is of extreme importance to the health of the American people in other areas of heart as well as in rheumatic fever.
I would hope that through both agencies that there could be means ultimately developed whereby we could give greater stability and continuity of assurance of support to outstanding workers.
I think the Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, has given every evidence that it is interested in that and is accepting its responsibility:
I am not at all certain that there is any legislative need for changing the law to make that possible, but I do think that the level of funds is one way in which it could be helped.
So far as the motion with regard to applied knowledge is concerned, I would say that the local heart associations throughout the country, under the guidance of the national organization, have this as one of their major problems, and that they are doing as much as it is humanly possible at the present time to do to see that these prophylactic programs get into operation working with medical societies, health departments, and others. I do think that there is one serious threat to effective work in this area, and that is that there apparently has been a reduction in the grants to States for funds, so that the State health departments cannot make plans in these areas in a more effective statewide manner.
So far as I am aware, those are the only two ways in which the progress of application of our present knowledge, along with the educational program which we have discussed, can become increasingly more effective.
The CHAIRMAN. I would not want my question to even indicate the thought that governmental activity either at the Federal, State, or local level should take the place of the voluntary effort which is being made by organizations. I am thinking in terms of cooperation, and supplementing, so to speak, and the assisting of one by the other.
For instance, in the answer that you have just made, you made mention of the fact that very often in conducting research there is some fact ascertained which does not necessarily have direct application to the particular research which is being carried on, and yet is valuable information maybe from some other standpoint.
That leads me to ask a question. Having in mind that we have heart disease, cancer, mental illness, and so forth, and that research on all of which is being conducted, we will say, in a vertical way within their particular confines, should this research in the several fields be coordinated? When research in any one of them ascertains some fact which may be of assistance, not necessarily in the heart field so much as in the cancer field, or whatnot, as it may happen to be, should there not be some coordinating agency which would bring the whole research and its results within into a horizontal attitude In other words, should it not work across the different types of research for different diseases?
You are interested in the heart diseases and you are right in that. Others are interested in the research on cancer. When you have developed something in heart research which is an advantage in one of these other special research activities, should there not be some agency of Government or otherwise which would coordinate those studies in such a way that what you gain in one, which may not have any application to that particular one, will not be lost as to the one to which it does have a real application and a real purpose and a real use ?
Dr. JONES. I think there are two aspects of that. One is that for really great progress we are dependent on great basic or fundamental knowledge, knowledge that is applicable to a broad field. There unquestionably exists a number of blocks to communications between scientists because of the sheer volume of data which is existent today in any one particular area.
I think that scientific publications unquestionably could be improved with regard to the transmission of knowledge across from one interest or barrier to another. It is a difficult subject.
I think there is a fair amount of effort at correlating that and that in our schools, for instance, particularly our medical schools, that is a subject of considerable importance and general interest.