The United Nations, Peace and Security: From Collective Security to the Responsibility to ProtectPreventing humanitarian atrocities is becoming as important for the United Nations as dealing with inter-state war. In this book, Ramesh Thakur examines the transformation in UN operations, analysing its changing role and structure. He asks why, when and how force may be used and argues that the growing gulf between legality and legitimacy is evidence of an eroded sense of international community. He considers the tension between the US, with its capacity to use force and project power, and the UN, as the centre of the international law enforcement system. He asserts the central importance of the rule of law and of a rules-based order focused on the UN as the foundation of a civilised system of international relations. This book will be of interest to students of the UN and international organisations in politics, law and international relations departments, as well as policymakers in the UN and other NGOs. |
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
weaponisation Within the constraints of the NPT a nonnuclear | 170 |
8 | 181 |
ambassador to the UN during its twoyear term on the | 195 |
9 | 203 |
10 | 222 |
11 | 244 |
12 | 264 |
sorry one A history of smouldering sectarian conflicts and ethnic | 282 |
6 | 134 |
to export oil Iraq would be required to transfer all | 148 |
6 | 134 |
to export oil Iraq would be required to transfer all | 148 |
7 | 159 |
12 | 264 |
sorry one A history of smouldering sectarian conflicts and ethnic | 282 |
13 | 291 |
14 | 320 |
Other editions - View all
The United Nations, Peace and Security: From Collective Security to the ... Ramesh Thakur No preview available - 2006 |
The United Nations, Peace and Security: From Collective Security to the ... Ramesh Thakur No preview available - 2006 |
Common terms and phrases
action administration Africa agenda American atrocities authorisation authority aVairs challenge Charter civilian Cold War Commission conflict consensus Darfur developing countries disarmament diVerent diYcult domestic East Timor economic enforcement eVective eVorts financial first five force foreign policy genocide global governments groups human rights human security humanitarian intervention ICISS India institutions interests international community international criminal International Criminal Court international law international peace Iraq Iraq War Iraqi justice Kofi Kosovo legitimacy major powers Mark Pieth military missions moral multilateral national security NATO non-proliferation norm nuclear weapons oil-for-food programme organisation oYce oYcials peace and security peace operations permanent members political Ramesh Thakur reflected reform Report resolution responsibility to protect role Rwanda Saddam Hussein Secretary-General Security Council significant Somalia sovereignty specific staV suVering target terrorism terrorist threat tion treaty Tribune UN’s unilateral United Nations University Press UNSC veto Washington Western world order York
Popular passages
Page 210 - The Security Council shall, where appropriate, utilize such regional arrangements or agencies for enforcement action under its authority. But no enforcement action shall be taken under regional arrangements or by regional agencies without the authorization of the Security Council...
Page 32 - Should the Security Council consider that measures provided for in Article 41 would be inadequate or have proved to be inadequate, it may take such action by air, sea or land forces as may be necessary to maintain or restore international peace and security.
Page 268 - A. large scale loss of life, actual or apprehended, with genocidal intent or not, which is the product either of deliberate state action, or state neglect or inability to act, or a failed state situation; or B. large scale 'ethnic cleansing', actual or apprehended, whether carried out by killing, forced expulsion, acts of terror or rape.
Page 227 - Any other act intended to cause death or serious bodily injury to a civilian, or to any other person not taking an active part in the hostilities in a situation of armed conflict, when the purpose of such act, by its nature or context, is to intimidate a population, or to compel a government or an international organization to do or to abstain from doing any act.
Page 265 - Where a population is suffering serious harm, as a result of internal war, insurgency, repression or state failure, and the state in question is unwilling or unable to halt or avert it, the principle of nonintervention yields to the international responsibility to protect.
Page 233 - What will die is the fantasy of the UN as the foundation of a new world order. As we sift the debris, it will be important to preserve, the better to understand, the intellectual wreckage of the liberal conceit of safety through international law administered by international...
Page 268 - Military intervention for human protection purposes is an exceptional and extraordinary measure. To be warranted, there must be serious and irreparable harm occurring to human beings, or imminently likely to occur, of the following kind: A.
Page 265 - M. Deng et al., Sovereignty as Responsibility: Conflict Management in Africa (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1996), esp.