 An analysis of section 2680 (a), the exception with which we are concerned, emphasizes the congressional purpose to except the acts here charged as negligence from the authorization to sue (p. 32). "Even assuming their correctness arguendo (the district...  Texas City Claims Act: Hearings ... H.R. 4045 - Page 220by United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1955 - 267 pagesFull view - About this book
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1954 - 934 pages
...establishing a quarantine, assault, libel, fiscal operations, etc., was barred. An analysis of § 2680 (a), the exception with which we are concerned, emphasizes the congressional purpose to except the acts here charged as negligence from the authorization to sue.27 It will be noted from the... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1954 - 364 pages
...establishing a quarantine, assault, libel, fiscal operations, etc., were barred. An analysis of § 2680 (a), the exception with which we are concerned, emphasizes the congressional purpose to except the acts here charged as negligence from the authorization to sue.27 It will be noted from the... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1955 - 146 pages
...to the Tort Claims Act itself, the Supreme Court majority opinion said: "An analysis of section 2680 (a), the exception with which we are concerned, emphasizes the congressional purpose to except the acts here charged as negligence from the authorization to sue." [Italic supplied.] This... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee No. 2 - 1956 - 282 pages
...clear by the following language appearing in the majority opinion (p. 32): An analysis of section 2680 (a), the exception with which we are concerned, emphasizes the congressional purpose to except the acts here charged as negligence from the authorization to sue. The Court also stated (p.... | |
 | United States. Congress. Atomic Energy Joint Committee - 1965 - 465 pages
...is made clear from the following excerpts of its majority opinion: "An analysis of section 2680(a), the exception with which we are concerned, emphasizes the congressional purpose to except the acts here charged as negligence from the authorization to sue (p. 32). "Even assuming their... | |
| |
