Page images
PDF
EPUB

Chapter III

value of the deliberations themselves. Professional authorities may be relied upon to continue the work of investigation and discussion begun at The Hague, to the great advantage, no doubt, of that "further study on the part of the various Governments," which the Peace Conference was obliged to content itself in recommending.

CHAPTER IV

THE WORK OF THE SECOND COMMITTEE

I. THE CONVENTION FOR THE ADAPTATION TO MARI-
TIME WARFARE OF THE PRINCIPLES OF THE GENEVA
CONVENTION OF AUGUST 22, 1864

THE Second Committee of the Conference, to which was referred the subject of the extension of the principles of the Geneva Convention of August 22, 1864, to maritime warfare, referred the subject to its First Sub-Committee, presided over by M. Asser of the Netherlands, and this in turn appointed a Committee consisting of Professor Renault of France, Chairman and Reporter, Vice-Admiral Sir John Fisher of Great Britain, Captain Scheine of Russia, Captain Siegel of Germany, Lieutenant-Colonel á Court of Great Britain, and Lieutenant Ovtchinnikow of Russia, which elaborated the articles embodied in the treaty on the subject.

In his report to the Conference, Professor Renault uses the following language:

Professor

"The general ideas which guided us are as fol- Report of lows: We considered it necessary to confine our-Renault. selves to the study of essential principles, and not to enter into details of organization and of regulations, which each State must fix according to its interests

Chapter IV

Report of
Professor
Renault.

[ocr errors]

and its customs. We determined the legal status from the international point of view of hospital ships; but how are such ships to be provided for? What shall be the duty of ships belonging to the State as distinguished from those belonging to relief societies? Should even such ships as are furnished by individuals for hospital service during a war be considered? These are questions which should be determined by each Government. They are not susceptible of a uniform solution because the situations are too diverse. In all countries the force of private charity may prove to be more or less active; besides, however much we may be animated by sentiments of humanity, we must not forget the necessities of war. It is necessary to avoid results, inspired, no doubt, by most generous sentiments, but exposed to the risk of frequent disregard by belligerents, because the latter's freedom of action may be unduly impaired. Humanity does not gain much by the adoption of a rule which remains a dead letter, and the idea of respect for engagements would only be enfeebled thereby. It is, therefore, indispensably necessary to impose no obligations except such as can be fulfilled. under all circumstances, and otherwise to allow the combatants all the latitude which they require. It is to be hoped that this will never be used for the purpose of hindering uselessly the work of alleviating suffering."

The representative of the United States on the sub-committee of the Second Committee of the Conference was Captain Alfred T. Mahan, whose careful

and lucid report regarding the work of the sub-com- Chapter IV mittee and his own attitude is deserving of special attention. It will be found in full in the Appendix. The articles of the treaty are as follows:

ARTICLE 1. Military hospital ships, that is to say, Official ships constructed or assigned by States especially and hospital ships. solely for the purpose of assisting the wounded, sick, or shipwrecked, and the names of which shall have been communicated to the belligerent Powers at the commencement or during the course of hostilities, and in any case before they are employed, shall be respected, and cannot be captured while hostilities last. These ships, moreover, are not on the same footing as men-of-war as regards their stay in a neutral port.

private indi

relief societies

ARTICLE 2. Hospital ships equipped solely or in Hospital ships part by the moneys of private individuals, or officially equipped by recognized relief societies, shall likewise be respected viduals or and exempt from capture, provided the belligerent of belligerent Power to whom they belong has given them an powers. official commission, and has notified their names to the opposing Power at the commencement of or during hostilities, and in any case before they are employed. These ships must be furnished with a certificate from the proper authorities declaring that they had been under their control while fitting out, and on final departure.

ARTICLE 3. Hospital ships equipped wholly or in Hospital ships part at the cost of private individuals or officially equipped in recognized societies of neutral countries, shall be re-tries. spected and exempt from capture, if the neutral Power to whom they belong has given them an official commission and notified their names to the

Chapter IV belligerent Powers at the commencement or during hostilities, and in any case before they are employed.

Regulations concerning all hospital ships.

ARTICLE 4. The ships mentioned in Articles 1, 2, and 3 shall furnish relief and assistance to the wounded, sick, and shipwrecked of the belligerents of either nationality. The Governments engage not to use these ships for any military purpose. These ships must not in any way hamper the movements of the combatants during and after an engagement; they shall act at their own risk and peril. The belligerents shall have the right to control and visit them; they can decline their aid, order them off, compel them to take a certain course and put a commissioner on board; they can even detain them if important circumstances require it. As far as possible, the belligerents shall inscribe in the sailing papers of the hospital ships such orders as they may give them.

The proposition to establish a particular code of signals for ships requesting or offering aid was negatived by the Committee, upon the ground that the accepted international code of signals now adopted by all seafaring nations is sufficient for all practical purposes.

In the words of Professor Renault, reporter of the Committee, regarding the prohibition of the use of these ships for military purposes: "The States enter into an engagement of honor by the very fact of their marking the vessels. It would be perfidy to violate this engagement."

An instance of "important circumstances" justifying the detention of a hospital ship on the part of

« PreviousContinue »