COURT RULES. KANSAS COURT OF APPEALS, Northern Department. 13. An application for a rehearing of any | and the question, statute or decision so overcause shall be by petition, signed by counsel, particularly setting forth the grounds thereof, and showing either that some question decisive of the case and duly submitted by counsel has been overlooked by the court, or that the decision is in conflict with an express statute or controlling decision, to which the attention of the court was not called either in the brief or oral argument, or which has been overlooked by the court; looked must be distinctly and particularly Southern Department. 14. All applications for rehearing of any case | larly set forth in the petition. The said petishall be by petition, signed by the party or his tion must be filed within 20 days from the attorney, setting forth the particular grounds date of filing of the opinion with the clerk of therefor, in which it must be made to appear the division of the court in which said case that some question decisive of the cause belongs; and a copy of the petition must be which was duly submitted by counsel has been served on the opposite party, or his attorney, overlooked by the court, or that the decision within 10 days after the filing of the same. is in conflict with some expressed statute or No argument or brief will be allowed on such controlling decision, to which the attention of petition, but if same is granted the case will the court was not called either in brief or oral | be assigned for rehearing, and such time given argument, or which has been overlooked by for argument or briefs as the court may allow. the court. The question, statute or decision so overlooked must be distinctly and particu Amendment of Rule 14, 40 Pac. viii. CASES REPORTED. Abbey v. McPherson (Kan. App.).. Adams, Bowersock v. (Kan. Sup.). Adams, Gould v. (Cal.). Adler v. Newell (Cal.). Aetna Life Ins. Co., Bonebrake v. (Kan. Ager, Joseph v. (Cal.). Aldridge v. Elerick (Kan. App.). Alexander v. McDow (Cal.).. Page 978 Barnes v. Cox (Utah).. .... Page 557 62 901 656 908 605 601 67 422 Bates v. Coronado Beach Co. (Cal.). 855 375 389 199 Baxter, Pease v. (Wash.). 899 .1028 City of Junction City v. Blades (Kan. App.) 677 .1069 City of Oakland, Grossman v. (Or.). 485 City of Oklahoma City v. Welsh (Ókl.)... 598 762 City of Olympia, Thomas & Co. v. (Wash.) 191 416 City of Port Townsend, Kuhn v. (Wash.). 923 City of Salina v. Wait (Kan. App.)...... 677 |