Chemical & Biological Defense: Updated Intelligence, Clear Guidance, & Consistent Priorities Needed to Guide Investments in Collective Protection |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 9
Page 5
For example, despite the Army and Marine Corps infantry often operating in similar environments, the Army called for its ground units to have collective protection while the Marine Corps did not. In addition, while Navy guidance has for ...
For example, despite the Army and Marine Corps infantry often operating in similar environments, the Army called for its ground units to have collective protection while the Marine Corps did not. In addition, while Navy guidance has for ...
Page 13
S. Marine Corps memorandum, Statement of Need for the Interim Page 13 GAO-07-113 Chemical and Biological Defense Collective Protection Vulnerabdities Are Not Widely Consistently Addressed.
S. Marine Corps memorandum, Statement of Need for the Interim Page 13 GAO-07-113 Chemical and Biological Defense Collective Protection Vulnerabdities Are Not Widely Consistently Addressed.
Page 16
For example, the Army, the Navy, and the Marine Corps do not require collective protection to be provided at their critical fixed facilities or other fixed facilities. Rather, these services rely on the discretion of their local ...
For example, the Army, the Navy, and the Marine Corps do not require collective protection to be provided at their critical fixed facilities or other fixed facilities. Rather, these services rely on the discretion of their local ...
Page 18
Afghanistan, Army and Marine Corps infantry units had different requirements for collective protection. For example, according to Army officials, the Army requires its light infantry units at the battalion level to provide collective ...
Afghanistan, Army and Marine Corps infantry units had different requirements for collective protection. For example, according to Army officials, the Army requires its light infantry units at the battalion level to provide collective ...
Page 19
In contrast, Marine Corps officials stated that they had no requirement for collective protection and no systems on hand. According to these officials, the current systems that are available are too large arid bulky to be carried with ...
In contrast, Marine Corps officials stated that they had no requirement for collective protection and no systems on hand. According to these officials, the current systems that are available are too large arid bulky to be carried with ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
ability According addition Agency Air Force approach areas Army assessments assets Assistant Secretary attack authority biological agents Biological Defense biological threat biological warfare chemical and biological chemical or biological chemical warfare clear collective protection equipment combatant commanders concepts consistent continue countries criteria critical facilities Critical Infrastructure decisions Department of Defense determine develop Directive Director of National DOD's effectively efforts ensure environment example expeditionary functions funding Government guidance Homeland Defense identify improvements inconsistent increase installation preparedness installation protection installation protection activities integrated intelligence community investments issues Letter levels limited Marine Corps medical units military services missile mission National Intelligence Estimate Navy obtain Office operating organizations overall overseas facilities policies prioritizing problems range recommendation regarding requirements responsibility Secretary of Defense ships single South Korea terrorist threat uncertainties updated vulnerability warfighting Washington weapons
Popular passages
Page 34 - CMS and interested congressional committees. We will also make copies available to others upon request. In addition, this report will be available at no charge on GAO's Web site at http://www.gao.gov. If you or your staff have any questions about this report, please contact me at (202) 512-7114 or cosgrovej@gao.gov.
Page 50 - GAO's commitment to good government is reflected in its core values of accountability, integrity, and reliability. The fastest and easiest way to obtain copies of GAO documents at no cost is through GAO's Web site (www.gao.gov). Each weekday, GAO posts newly released reports, testimony, and correspondence on its Web site. To have GAO e~mai.i you a list of newly posted products every afternoon, go to www.gao.gov and select, "Subscribe to Updates.
Page 26 - To this end, the study is sponsored jointly by the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict (OASD/SO/LIC) and the Office of the Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs (DOS/R).
Page 11 - The Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United States Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction, March 31, 2005 ~ http://www.wmd.
Page 28 - Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical and Biological Programs, a position called for by statute.
Page 2 - GAO, Defense Management: Additional Actions Needed to Enhance DOD's Risk-Based Approach for Making Resource Decisions, GAO-06-13 (Washington, BC: Nov.
Page 39 - This work is being performed in response to a request by the House Subcommittee on National Security, Emerging Threats, and International Relations. For...
Page 19 - OPNAV Instruction 9070.1, Survivability Policy for Surface Ships of the US Navy, Enclosures (2) and (3) (Sept.
Page 2 - DOD's organizational culture resists department-level approaches to priority setting and investment decisions.
Page 6 - In written comments on a draft of this report, DOD and the Director of National Intelligence both generally agreed with all of our recommendations.