Interactions of High Energy Particles with Nuclei |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 8
Page 3
... we present the solution in the form ** ( x , y , z ) = eiks p ( x , y , z ) . x 2 If the potential is smooth enough ( so that second derivatives of y can be neglected ) , one can show that y satisfies the approximate equation 0p ( x ...
... we present the solution in the form ** ( x , y , z ) = eiks p ( x , y , z ) . x 2 If the potential is smooth enough ( so that second derivatives of y can be neglected ) , one can show that y satisfies the approximate equation 0p ( x ...
Page 4
The most complete analysis one can perform is presumably to employ the Watson multiple scattering theory , but we shall not present it here . In fact it is amazing that ( 2.1 ) works so well . Even in the conceptually simplest cases of ...
The most complete analysis one can perform is presumably to employ the Watson multiple scattering theory , but we shall not present it here . In fact it is amazing that ( 2.1 ) works so well . Even in the conceptually simplest cases of ...
Page 8
In the case when only one Coulomb potential is present ( hence B = 0 , but E + 0 ) , we have + M ( A ) ixt { D ) db exp ( ia.b ) [ 1 exp dzV ( b 2 ) ) Xin where ( -ie f * d = V < b , es + i1 S ** dz ...
In the case when only one Coulomb potential is present ( hence B = 0 , but E + 0 ) , we have + M ( A ) ixt { D ) db exp ( ia.b ) [ 1 exp dzV ( b 2 ) ) Xin where ( -ie f * d = V < b , es + i1 S ** dz ...
Page 18
But as long as we construct the profiles of the target nucleus from profiles of elastic scattering , the processes like the one shown in figure 7 ( with excited states of the projectile present at intermediate steps ) are excluded .
But as long as we construct the profiles of the target nucleus from profiles of elastic scattering , the processes like the one shown in figure 7 ( with excited states of the projectile present at intermediate steps ) are excluded .
Page 22
[ 15 ] —the calculation was done with the Coulomb interactions present ) that to a good approximation ( note that since this formula does not exhibit a forward dip , it is not valid for small A ) Z dopt d12 N Q A ( 15 • ( a ) | + \ s ...
[ 15 ] —the calculation was done with the Coulomb interactions present ) that to a good approximation ( note that since this formula does not exhibit a forward dip , it is not valid for small A ) Z dopt d12 N Q A ( 15 • ( a ) | + \ s ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Common terms and phrases
absorption additivity analysis approximately assume attenuation beam Bureau of Standards charge coherent collision complete components compute consider contribution corrections Coulomb Coulomb interactions coupling cross section db exp depend describe deuteron diffractive production processes discussed effects elastic scattering elastic scattering amplitude equation example excited existence exp ia.b experimental experiments expression fact factor field final formula forward given gives Glauber ground hadrons Hence high energy limit important incident particle inelastic initial Institute interactions introduce magnetic mass measurement momentum transfer multiple scattering National Bureau Note nuclear nuclear targets nuclei nucleon numbers objects obtained parameters phase shifts photon photoproduction physical position possible present problem profiles regeneration shadowing single Standards step strong structure technical vector meson wave function