Interactions of High Energy Particles with Nuclei |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 12
Page 13
For instance , the above contribution gives : ALL POSSIBLE EXCITED STATES Suppose we reject the intermediate excited states and take only the ground state as a possible inter- mediate state ( this is the way to eliminate all channels ...
For instance , the above contribution gives : ALL POSSIBLE EXCITED STATES Suppose we reject the intermediate excited states and take only the ground state as a possible inter- mediate state ( this is the way to eliminate all channels ...
Page 14
The other " moral " is that if we know the structure of the com- posite body ( b ) we may still use a generalized Glauber model with additivity of all possible phase shifts of the pairs of components of ( a ) and ( b ) .
The other " moral " is that if we know the structure of the com- posite body ( b ) we may still use a generalized Glauber model with additivity of all possible phase shifts of the pairs of components of ( a ) and ( b ) .
Page 18
... ( including all possible effects which the model allows for ) and then found a definite dis- crepancy with experimentally measured Tor - it would very strongly suggest the existence of inelastic shadowing phenomena described above .
... ( including all possible effects which the model allows for ) and then found a definite dis- crepancy with experimentally measured Tor - it would very strongly suggest the existence of inelastic shadowing phenomena described above .
Page 22
The most important are general characteristics : density distributions ( hence possible deformations ) but not internal correlations . From the published analyses of hadron - nucleus scattering ( see e.g. , [ S2 ] , [ 15 ] , [ 3 ] ) one ...
The most important are general characteristics : density distributions ( hence possible deformations ) but not internal correlations . From the published analyses of hadron - nucleus scattering ( see e.g. , [ S2 ] , [ 15 ] , [ 3 ] ) one ...
Page 27
... that when we use the same internal wave function in the initial and final states , we exclude , by doing this , any possible relativistic deformations of the recoiling target ( we are still discussing only elastic processes ) .
... that when we use the same internal wave function in the initial and final states , we exclude , by doing this , any possible relativistic deformations of the recoiling target ( we are still discussing only elastic processes ) .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Common terms and phrases
absorption additivity analysis approximately assume attenuation beam coherent collision complete components compute consider contribution corrections Coulomb Coulomb interactions coupling cross section db exp db exp i▲·b depend describe deuteron diffractive production processes discussed effects elastic scattering elastic scattering amplitude equation example excited existence experimental experiments expression fact factor field final formula forward given gives Glauber ground hadrons Hence high energy limit important incident particle inelastic initial Institute interactions introduce magnetic mass measurement momentum transfer multiple scattering Note nuclear nuclear targets nuclei nucleon numbers objects obtained parameters phase shifts photon photoproduction physical position possible problem profiles regeneration shadowing single Standards step strong structure technical vector meson wave function weak
Bibliographic information
| Title | Interactions of High Energy Particles with Nuclei Volume 139 of NBS monograph |
| Author | Wiesław Czyż |
| Publisher | National Bureau of Standards, 1975 |
| Original from | the University of Michigan |
| Digitized | 21 Nov 2007 |
| Length | 69 pages |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |