Interactions of High Energy Particles with NucleiNational Bureau of Standards, 1975 - 69 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 9
Page 3
... initial and final wave functions of the target nucleus . Yi , ( 2.1 ) One can produce many arguments which make this important formula plausible . One can use , e.g. , an optical description of attenuation of a wave penetrating a medium ...
... initial and final wave functions of the target nucleus . Yi , ( 2.1 ) One can produce many arguments which make this important formula plausible . One can use , e.g. , an optical description of attenuation of a wave penetrating a medium ...
Page 18
... initial one - a very complex process in which the whole of the nucleus must take part ( hence it occurs with small probability ) . ( iii ) Hence " inelastic shadowing " stands a good chance to contribute little ( a few percent ) to the ...
... initial one - a very complex process in which the whole of the nucleus must take part ( hence it occurs with small probability ) . ( iii ) Hence " inelastic shadowing " stands a good chance to contribute little ( a few percent ) to the ...
Page 27
... initial and final states , we exclude , by doing this , any possible relativistic deformations of the recoiling target ( we are still discussing only elastic processes ) . For large momentum transfers ( A2 / M2 ~ 1 ) this is probably ...
... initial and final states , we exclude , by doing this , any possible relativistic deformations of the recoiling target ( we are still discussing only elastic processes ) . For large momentum transfers ( A2 / M2 ~ 1 ) this is probably ...
Page 35
... initial and final states . ) As long as the time of the passage through ( or the interaction with ) the target is T << 2p M2 — M * 2 › we can consider the states to be degenerate because their relative phase factor during the collision ...
... initial and final states . ) As long as the time of the passage through ( or the interaction with ) the target is T << 2p M2 — M * 2 › we can consider the states to be degenerate because their relative phase factor during the collision ...
Page 56
... initial ( one pion ) and the final ( 3 states ) . Let us repeat the arguments again . 1 Initial state = + Final state = 2 2 small admixture = | Ĭ ) + d | 2 ) 1 + - = | 2 ) —d * | ĩ ) small admixture ( the orthogonality condition ...
... initial ( one pion ) and the final ( 3 states ) . Let us repeat the arguments again . 1 Initial state = + Final state = 2 2 small admixture = | Ĭ ) + d | 2 ) 1 + - = | 2 ) —d * | ĩ ) small admixture ( the orthogonality condition ...
Common terms and phrases
absorption additivity of phase anomalous magnetic moment ú approximately assume attenuation b+½s beam Bureau of Standards coherent diffractive production collision Compton scattering compute Coulomb interactions Czyż d³r db exp i▲·b deuteron diagonalization diffractive production processes diffractive scattering discussed double scattering elastic scattering amplitude electromagnetic equation example excited experiments factor Feynman diagrams formula four-momentum Glauber model hadrons Hence high energy limit incident particle incident wave inelastic shadowing Interactions of High invariant mass K mesons multiple scattering National Bureau neutrino neutrons ññ Note nuclear matter nuclear targets nuclei nucleon obtained optical theorem parameters phase shifts photon photoproduction of vector physical pion production amplitude profiles quantum numbers regeneration Řº shadowing effects single scattering spin strongly interacting target nucleus total cross section vector meson VMD model wave function γν Σ Σ