Interactions of High Energy Particles with Nuclei |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 9
Page 3
... are the initial and final wave functions of the target nucleus . One can produce many arguments which make this important formula plausible . One can use , e.g. , an optical description of attenuation of a wave penetrating a medium ...
... are the initial and final wave functions of the target nucleus . One can produce many arguments which make this important formula plausible . One can use , e.g. , an optical description of attenuation of a wave penetrating a medium ...
Page 18
( ii ) Nondiffractive processes are presumably not contributing to the inelastic shadowbecause the whole configuration of the target would eventually have to go back to the initial ...
( ii ) Nondiffractive processes are presumably not contributing to the inelastic shadowbecause the whole configuration of the target would eventually have to go back to the initial ...
Page 27
... that when we use the same internal wave function in the initial and final states , we exclude , by doing this , any possible relativistic deformations of the recoiling target ( we are still discussing only elastic processes ) .
... that when we use the same internal wave function in the initial and final states , we exclude , by doing this , any possible relativistic deformations of the recoiling target ( we are still discussing only elastic processes ) .
Page 35
Then their energies differ : > M2 - M * E - E * = Vp ? + M2- Vpa + M * 2 2p p large 4 ( The only important thing in these approximations is to have very large longitudinal momenta in the initial and final states . ) ...
Then their energies differ : > M2 - M * E - E * = Vp ? + M2- Vpa + M * 2 2p p large 4 ( The only important thing in these approximations is to have very large longitudinal momenta in the initial and final states . ) ...
Page 56
1 2 Initial state + = 11 ) + d | Ž ) small admixture 2 1 + - 12 ) -d * li ) ( the orthogonality condition : ( - ( i |. Final state small admixture A SLABS INCIDENT BEAM 2 : AL ) : ܐ 56.
1 2 Initial state + = 11 ) + d | Ž ) small admixture 2 1 + - 12 ) -d * li ) ( the orthogonality condition : ( - ( i |. Final state small admixture A SLABS INCIDENT BEAM 2 : AL ) : ܐ 56.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Common terms and phrases
absorption additivity analysis approximately assume attenuation beam Bureau of Standards charge coherent collision complete components compute consider contribution corrections Coulomb Coulomb interactions coupling cross section db exp depend describe deuteron diffractive production processes discussed effects elastic scattering elastic scattering amplitude equation example excited existence exp ia.b experimental experiments expression fact factor field final formula forward given gives Glauber ground hadrons Hence high energy limit important incident particle inelastic initial Institute interactions introduce magnetic mass measurement momentum transfer multiple scattering National Bureau Note nuclear nuclear targets nuclei nucleon numbers objects obtained parameters phase shifts photon photoproduction physical position possible present problem profiles regeneration shadowing single Standards step strong structure technical vector meson wave function
Bibliographic information
| Title | Interactions of High Energy Particles with Nuclei Volume 139 of NBS monograph |
| Author | Wiesław Czyż |
| Publisher | National Bureau of Standards, 1975 |
| Original from | the University of Michigan |
| Digitized | 21 Nov 2007 |
| Length | 69 pages |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |