Interactions of High Energy Particles with NucleiNational Bureau of Standards, 1975 - 69 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 33
Page 3
... gives მ ę ( x , y , z ) dz == i V ( x , y , z ) 4 ( x , y , z ) , V Yk≈eik z - dz'V ( x , y , z ′ ) . บ 81 2 Notice that to have scattering in the limit E → we have to have V ~ EV ' where V ' is energy independent . Otherwise the ...
... gives მ ę ( x , y , z ) dz == i V ( x , y , z ) 4 ( x , y , z ) , V Yk≈eik z - dz'V ( x , y , z ′ ) . บ 81 2 Notice that to have scattering in the limit E → we have to have V ~ EV ' where V ' is energy independent . Otherwise the ...
Page 4
... give examples in which it breaks down . Examples Example 1. Dirac particle with anomalous magnetic moment in a given electromagnetic static field ( notation from Bjorken and Drell [ S7 ] ) : iv - eA- ке ( i - c + Fm ) = 0 , 4m where y ...
... give examples in which it breaks down . Examples Example 1. Dirac particle with anomalous magnetic moment in a given electromagnetic static field ( notation from Bjorken and Drell [ S7 ] ) : iv - eA- ке ( i - c + Fm ) = 0 , 4m where y ...
Page 5
... end up with an expression which is virtually the same as in the case of the Schrödinger equation : a ( -i + ev ) p = 0 dz whose solution ❤ = u ( k ) exp k ) exp ( -ie [ ' _ da'V ( b , a ' ) ) 00 gives where u ( k ) is a four - 5.
... end up with an expression which is virtually the same as in the case of the Schrödinger equation : a ( -i + ev ) p = 0 dz whose solution ❤ = u ( k ) exp k ) exp ( -ie [ ' _ da'V ( b , a ' ) ) 00 gives where u ( k ) is a four - 5.
Page 6
Wiesław Czyż. gives where u ( k ) is a four - spinor . As M ( k ' , k ) == m ↓ = u ( k ) exp ( ikz - ie [ ' _ dz'V ( b , 2 ' ) ) , 22 [ d3rī svoеV ( b , 2 ) , where = u ( k ' ) exp ( iEz + iA . b ) , we get m f · .00 z ) 91x ( k ' , k ) ...
Wiesław Czyż. gives where u ( k ) is a four - spinor . As M ( k ' , k ) == m ↓ = u ( k ) exp ( ikz - ie [ ' _ dz'V ( b , 2 ' ) ) , 22 [ d3rī svoеV ( b , 2 ) , where = u ( k ' ) exp ( iEz + iA . b ) , we get m f · .00 z ) 91x ( k ' , k ) ...
Page 8
... Because we have 00 CX ) -CX ) [ a ( x , y , z ) , a ( x , y , z ′ ) ] # 0 . 81 ( A1 + A2 ) Xi One could argue that the coupling to the anomalous moment is weak and hence not very relevant . This is true , but one can give some other 8.
... Because we have 00 CX ) -CX ) [ a ( x , y , z ) , a ( x , y , z ′ ) ] # 0 . 81 ( A1 + A2 ) Xi One could argue that the coupling to the anomalous moment is weak and hence not very relevant . This is true , but one can give some other 8.
Common terms and phrases
absorption additivity of phase anomalous magnetic moment ú approximately assume attenuation b+½s beam Bureau of Standards coherent diffractive production collision Compton scattering compute Coulomb interactions Czyż d³r db exp i▲·b deuteron diagonalization diffractive production processes diffractive scattering discussed double scattering elastic scattering amplitude electromagnetic equation example excited experiments factor Feynman diagrams formula four-momentum Glauber model hadrons Hence high energy limit incident particle incident wave inelastic shadowing Interactions of High invariant mass K mesons multiple scattering National Bureau neutrino neutrons ññ Note nuclear matter nuclear targets nuclei nucleon obtained optical theorem parameters phase shifts photon photoproduction of vector physical pion production amplitude profiles quantum numbers regeneration Řº shadowing effects single scattering spin strongly interacting target nucleus total cross section vector meson VMD model wave function γν Σ Σ