Interactions of High Energy Particles with NucleiNational Bureau of Standards, 1975 - 69 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 33
Page 3
... gives მ ę ( x , y , z ) dz == i V ( x , y , z ) 4 ( x , y , z ) , V Yk≈eik z - dz'V ( x , y , z ′ ) . บ 81 2 Notice that to have scattering in the limit E → we have to have V ~ EV ' where V ' is energy independent . Otherwise the ...
... gives მ ę ( x , y , z ) dz == i V ( x , y , z ) 4 ( x , y , z ) , V Yk≈eik z - dz'V ( x , y , z ′ ) . บ 81 2 Notice that to have scattering in the limit E → we have to have V ~ EV ' where V ' is energy independent . Otherwise the ...
Page 4
... give examples in which it breaks down . Examples Example 1. Dirac particle with anomalous magnetic moment in a given electromagnetic static field ( notation from Bjorken and Drell [ S7 ] ) : iv - eA- ке ( i - c + Fm ) = 0 , 4m where y ...
... give examples in which it breaks down . Examples Example 1. Dirac particle with anomalous magnetic moment in a given electromagnetic static field ( notation from Bjorken and Drell [ S7 ] ) : iv - eA- ке ( i - c + Fm ) = 0 , 4m where y ...
Page 5
... end up with an expression which is virtually the same as in the case of the Schrödinger equation : a ( -i + ev ) p = 0 dz whose solution ❤ = u ( k ) exp k ) exp ( -ie [ ' _ da'V ( b , a ' ) ) 00 gives where u ( k ) is a four - 5.
... end up with an expression which is virtually the same as in the case of the Schrödinger equation : a ( -i + ev ) p = 0 dz whose solution ❤ = u ( k ) exp k ) exp ( -ie [ ' _ da'V ( b , a ' ) ) 00 gives where u ( k ) is a four - 5.
Page 6
Wiesław Czyż. gives where u ( k ) is a four - spinor . As M ( k ' , k ) == m ↓ = u ( k ) exp ( ikz - ie [ ' _ dz'V ( b , 2 ' ) ) , 22 [ d3rī svoеV ( b , 2 ) , where = u ( k ' ) exp ( iEz + iA . b ) , we get m f · .00 z ) 91x ( k ' , k ) ...
Wiesław Czyż. gives where u ( k ) is a four - spinor . As M ( k ' , k ) == m ↓ = u ( k ) exp ( ikz - ie [ ' _ dz'V ( b , 2 ' ) ) , 22 [ d3rī svoеV ( b , 2 ) , where = u ( k ' ) exp ( iEz + iA . b ) , we get m f · .00 z ) 91x ( k ' , k ) ...
Page 8
... Because we have 00 CX ) -CX ) [ a ( x , y , z ) , a ( x , y , z ′ ) ] # 0 . 81 ( A1 + A2 ) Xi One could argue that the coupling to the anomalous moment is weak and hence not very relevant . This is true , but one can give some other 8.
... Because we have 00 CX ) -CX ) [ a ( x , y , z ) , a ( x , y , z ′ ) ] # 0 . 81 ( A1 + A2 ) Xi One could argue that the coupling to the anomalous moment is weak and hence not very relevant . This is true , but one can give some other 8.
Common terms and phrases
absorption additivity analysis approximately assume attenuation beam coherent collision complete components compute consider contribution corrections Coulomb Coulomb interactions coupling cross section db exp db exp i▲·b depend describe deuteron diffractive production processes discussed effects elastic scattering elastic scattering amplitude equation example excited existence experimental experiments expression fact factor field final formula forward given gives Glauber ground hadrons Hence high energy limit important incident particle inelastic initial Institute interactions introduce magnetic mass measurement momentum transfer multiple scattering Note nuclear nuclear targets nuclei nucleon numbers objects obtained parameters phase shifts photon photoproduction physical position possible problem profiles regeneration shadowing single Standards step strong structure technical vector meson wave function weak