Interactions of High Energy Particles with NucleiNational Bureau of Standards, 1975 - 69 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 10
Page 3
... final wave functions of the target nucleus . Yi , ( 2.1 ) One can produce many arguments which make this important formula plausible . One can use , e.g. , an optical description of attenuation of a wave penetrating a medium . One can ...
... final wave functions of the target nucleus . Yi , ( 2.1 ) One can produce many arguments which make this important formula plausible . One can use , e.g. , an optical description of attenuation of a wave penetrating a medium . One can ...
Page 27
... final states , we exclude , by doing this , any possible relativistic deformations of the recoiling target ( we are still discussing only elastic processes ) . For large momentum transfers ( A2 / M2 ~ 1 ) this is probably not a good ...
... final states , we exclude , by doing this , any possible relativistic deformations of the recoiling target ( we are still discussing only elastic processes ) . For large momentum transfers ( A2 / M2 ~ 1 ) this is probably not a good ...
Page 33
... final formula is MKL → KS 0 = 1 ik 22π :) . db exp ( i △ · b ) { exp [ ixño ( b ) ] — exp [ ixà ° ( b ) ] } . The elementary amplitudes can be gotten from K ± -nucleon scattering amplitudes assuming isospin symmetry : ƒK ° n ( 0 ) ...
... final formula is MKL → KS 0 = 1 ik 22π :) . db exp ( i △ · b ) { exp [ ixño ( b ) ] — exp [ ixà ° ( b ) ] } . The elementary amplitudes can be gotten from K ± -nucleon scattering amplitudes assuming isospin symmetry : ƒK ° n ( 0 ) ...
Page 35
... final states . ) As long as the time of the passage through ( or the interaction with ) the target is T << 2p M2 — M * 2 › we can consider the states to be degenerate because their relative phase factor during the collision is very ...
... final states . ) As long as the time of the passage through ( or the interaction with ) the target is T << 2p M2 — M * 2 › we can consider the states to be degenerate because their relative phase factor during the collision is very ...
Page 36
Wiesław Czyż. π Final state : n + π = + 12 ñ = d1 TM ” | ññ ) + d2 TM ” | μ ) . p = small admixture In the sense given earlier in these notes , for the purpose of describing elastic scattering we have approximately ( compare eq ( 4.4 ) ...
Wiesław Czyż. π Final state : n + π = + 12 ñ = d1 TM ” | ññ ) + d2 TM ” | μ ) . p = small admixture In the sense given earlier in these notes , for the purpose of describing elastic scattering we have approximately ( compare eq ( 4.4 ) ...
Common terms and phrases
absorption additivity of phase anomalous magnetic moment ú approximately assume attenuation b+½s beam Bureau of Standards coherent diffractive production collision Compton scattering compute Coulomb interactions Czyż d³r db exp i▲·b deuteron diagonalization diffractive production processes diffractive scattering discussed double scattering elastic scattering amplitude electromagnetic equation example excited experiments factor Feynman diagrams formula four-momentum Glauber model hadrons Hence high energy limit incident particle incident wave inelastic shadowing Interactions of High invariant mass K mesons multiple scattering National Bureau neutrino neutrons ññ Note nuclear matter nuclear targets nuclei nucleon obtained optical theorem parameters phase shifts photon photoproduction of vector physical pion production amplitude profiles quantum numbers regeneration Řº shadowing effects single scattering spin strongly interacting target nucleus total cross section vector meson VMD model wave function γν Σ Σ