Interactions of High Energy Particles with NucleiNational Bureau of Standards, 1975 - 69 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 10
Page 3
... final wave functions of the target nucleus . Yi , ( 2.1 ) One can produce many arguments which make this important formula plausible . One can use , e.g. , an optical description of attenuation of a wave penetrating a medium . One can ...
... final wave functions of the target nucleus . Yi , ( 2.1 ) One can produce many arguments which make this important formula plausible . One can use , e.g. , an optical description of attenuation of a wave penetrating a medium . One can ...
Page 27
... final states , we exclude , by doing this , any possible relativistic deformations of the recoiling target ( we are still discussing only elastic processes ) . For large momentum transfers ( A2 / M2 ~ 1 ) this is probably not a good ...
... final states , we exclude , by doing this , any possible relativistic deformations of the recoiling target ( we are still discussing only elastic processes ) . For large momentum transfers ( A2 / M2 ~ 1 ) this is probably not a good ...
Page 33
... final formula is MKL → KS 0 = 1 ik 22π :) . db exp ( i △ · b ) { exp [ ixño ( b ) ] — exp [ ixà ° ( b ) ] } . The elementary amplitudes can be gotten from K ± -nucleon scattering amplitudes assuming isospin symmetry : ƒK ° n ( 0 ) ...
... final formula is MKL → KS 0 = 1 ik 22π :) . db exp ( i △ · b ) { exp [ ixño ( b ) ] — exp [ ixà ° ( b ) ] } . The elementary amplitudes can be gotten from K ± -nucleon scattering amplitudes assuming isospin symmetry : ƒK ° n ( 0 ) ...
Page 35
... final states . ) As long as the time of the passage through ( or the interaction with ) the target is T << 2p M2 — M * 2 › we can consider the states to be degenerate because their relative phase factor during the collision is very ...
... final states . ) As long as the time of the passage through ( or the interaction with ) the target is T << 2p M2 — M * 2 › we can consider the states to be degenerate because their relative phase factor during the collision is very ...
Page 36
Wiesław Czyż. π Final state : n + π = + 12 ñ = d1 TM ” | ññ ) + d2 TM ” | μ ) . p = small admixture In the sense given earlier in these notes , for the purpose of describing elastic scattering we have approximately ( compare eq ( 4.4 ) ...
Wiesław Czyż. π Final state : n + π = + 12 ñ = d1 TM ” | ññ ) + d2 TM ” | μ ) . p = small admixture In the sense given earlier in these notes , for the purpose of describing elastic scattering we have approximately ( compare eq ( 4.4 ) ...
Common terms and phrases
absorption additivity analysis approximately assume attenuation beam coherent collision complete components compute consider contribution corrections Coulomb Coulomb interactions coupling cross section db exp db exp i▲·b depend describe deuteron diffractive production processes discussed effects elastic scattering elastic scattering amplitude equation example excited existence experimental experiments expression fact factor field final formula forward given gives Glauber ground hadrons Hence high energy limit important incident particle inelastic initial Institute interactions introduce magnetic mass measurement momentum transfer multiple scattering Note nuclear nuclear targets nuclei nucleon numbers objects obtained parameters phase shifts photon photoproduction physical position possible problem profiles regeneration shadowing single Standards step strong structure technical vector meson wave function weak