Interactions of High Energy Particles with Nuclei |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 16
Page 15
This formula was used successfully to : ( i ) reproduce the proton charge form factors from elastic scattering hadron - hadron cross sections . ( ii ) predict diffractive structure ( e.g. , diffractive minima ) of the high energy hadron ...
This formula was used successfully to : ( i ) reproduce the proton charge form factors from elastic scattering hadron - hadron cross sections . ( ii ) predict diffractive structure ( e.g. , diffractive minima ) of the high energy hadron ...
Page 22
These two factors make Coulomb corrections insignificant in dopt / d2 . How important are the details of the target nucleus wave function ? Not very important . The most important are general characteristics : density distributions ...
These two factors make Coulomb corrections insignificant in dopt / d2 . How important are the details of the target nucleus wave function ? Not very important . The most important are general characteristics : density distributions ...
Page 23
( i ) the shapes of target nuclei are the most important factors determining the cross sections ( ii ) the internal correlations of nucleons in the nucleus are unimportant for dosc / d2 or doelda . They are of some importance for dopt ...
( i ) the shapes of target nuclei are the most important factors determining the cross sections ( ii ) the internal correlations of nucleons in the nucleus are unimportant for dosc / d2 or doelda . They are of some importance for dopt ...
Page 24
Hence if we can factor out the c.m. wave function from the product Vo = II ; $ ; ( r ; ) we can stick to calculating M with y , but we have to multiply it by a correction factor : ( Q ( r ) | exp ( iA.r ) | R ( r ) ) - 1 .
Hence if we can factor out the c.m. wave function from the product Vo = II ; $ ; ( r ; ) we can stick to calculating M with y , but we have to multiply it by a correction factor : ( Q ( r ) | exp ( iA.r ) | R ( r ) ) - 1 .
Page 25
( iii ) The importance of the c.m. motion correction can be seen from the factor exp ( R'A / 4A ) . For small A ( say A = 2 , 3 or 4 ) it can be a correction of as much as 2 orders of magnitude for A ? ~ 0.3 GeV ?
( iii ) The importance of the c.m. motion correction can be seen from the factor exp ( R'A / 4A ) . For small A ( say A = 2 , 3 or 4 ) it can be a correction of as much as 2 orders of magnitude for A ? ~ 0.3 GeV ?
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Common terms and phrases
absorption additivity analysis approximately assume attenuation beam Bureau of Standards charge coherent collision complete components compute consider contribution corrections Coulomb Coulomb interactions coupling cross section db exp depend describe deuteron diffractive production processes discussed effects elastic scattering elastic scattering amplitude equation example excited existence exp ia.b experimental experiments expression fact factor field final formula forward given gives Glauber ground hadrons Hence high energy limit important incident particle inelastic initial Institute interactions introduce magnetic mass measurement momentum transfer multiple scattering National Bureau Note nuclear nuclear targets nuclei nucleon numbers objects obtained parameters phase shifts photon photoproduction physical position possible present problem profiles regeneration shadowing single Standards step strong structure technical vector meson wave function
Bibliographic information
| Title | Interactions of High Energy Particles with Nuclei Volume 139 of NBS monograph |
| Author | Wiesław Czyż |
| Publisher | National Bureau of Standards, 1975 |
| Original from | the University of Michigan |
| Digitized | 21 Nov 2007 |
| Length | 69 pages |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |