Interactions of High Energy Particles with Nuclei |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 5
Page 13
Hence the formula ( 3.2 ) sums over all intermediate excited states . For instance , the above contribution gives : ALL POSSIBLE EXCITED STATES Suppose we reject the intermediate excited states and take only the ground state as a ...
Hence the formula ( 3.2 ) sums over all intermediate excited states . For instance , the above contribution gives : ALL POSSIBLE EXCITED STATES Suppose we reject the intermediate excited states and take only the ground state as a ...
Page 14
When R60 we in fact remove all the intermediate excited states already mentioned : In this case THE PROCESSES : ARE NEGLIGIBLE , AND THE PROCESSES : DOMINATE Having written down the formula ( 3.2 ) this ...
When R60 we in fact remove all the intermediate excited states already mentioned : In this case THE PROCESSES : ARE NEGLIGIBLE , AND THE PROCESSES : DOMINATE Having written down the formula ( 3.2 ) this ...
Page 18
But as long as we construct the profiles of the target nucleus from profiles of elastic scattering , the processes like the one shown in figure 7 ( with excited states of the projectile present at intermediate steps ) are excluded .
But as long as we construct the profiles of the target nucleus from profiles of elastic scattering , the processes like the one shown in figure 7 ( with excited states of the projectile present at intermediate steps ) are excluded .
Page 62
It introduces " democracy ” among all physical states and treats the ground state of the incident particle on the same footing as the excited states . This makes good sense if one believes ( following Good and Walker [ 23 ] ) that in ...
It introduces " democracy ” among all physical states and treats the ground state of the incident particle on the same footing as the excited states . This makes good sense if one believes ( following Good and Walker [ 23 ] ) that in ...
Page 65
We want to keep the “ one step " production model , hence we assume the incident particle ground state | 1 ) to be “ well separated ” from a set of excited states | m ) from which the system | 2 ) emerges .
We want to keep the “ one step " production model , hence we assume the incident particle ground state | 1 ) to be “ well separated ” from a set of excited states | m ) from which the system | 2 ) emerges .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Common terms and phrases
absorption additivity analysis approximately assume attenuation beam Bureau of Standards charge coherent collision complete components compute consider contribution corrections Coulomb Coulomb interactions coupling cross section db exp depend describe deuteron diffractive production processes discussed effects elastic scattering elastic scattering amplitude equation example excited existence exp ia.b experimental experiments expression fact factor field final formula forward given gives Glauber ground hadrons Hence high energy limit important incident particle inelastic initial Institute interactions introduce magnetic mass measurement momentum transfer multiple scattering National Bureau Note nuclear nuclear targets nuclei nucleon numbers objects obtained parameters phase shifts photon photoproduction physical position possible present problem profiles regeneration shadowing single Standards step strong structure technical vector meson wave function
Bibliographic information
| Title | Interactions of High Energy Particles with Nuclei Volume 139 of NBS monograph |
| Author | Wiesław Czyż |
| Publisher | National Bureau of Standards, 1975 |
| Original from | the University of Michigan |
| Digitized | 21 Nov 2007 |
| Length | 69 pages |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |