Interactions of High Energy Particles with Nuclei |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 10
Page 18
From our discussion of the components of σTOT ( σel , σDT , σPROD ) it follows that the measure- ments of σror may be a good way of finding out whether the inelastic shadowing ( or inelastic screening ) corrections are important at very ...
From our discussion of the components of σTOT ( σel , σDT , σPROD ) it follows that the measure- ments of σror may be a good way of finding out whether the inelastic shadowing ( or inelastic screening ) corrections are important at very ...
Page 19
Let us consider first the Coulomb corrections for heavy nuclei . One can , in principle , use the individual amplitudes which have Coulomb interactions built into them ( this very tedious cal- culation has been done , e.g. , in refs .
Let us consider first the Coulomb corrections for heavy nuclei . One can , in principle , use the individual amplitudes which have Coulomb interactions built into them ( this very tedious cal- culation has been done , e.g. , in refs .
Page 22
These two factors make Coulomb corrections insignificant in do DT / do . How important are the details of the target nucleus wave function ? Not very important . The most important are general characteristics : density distributions ...
These two factors make Coulomb corrections insignificant in do DT / do . How important are the details of the target nucleus wave function ? Not very important . The most important are general characteristics : density distributions ...
Page 23
SA ' ) ( 3.8 ) Then we can compute the correction factor to M = ( M ( △ ; 81 ... SA ) ) assuming the wave function to be in the form of a product of the c.m. wave function and the internal wave function .
SA ' ) ( 3.8 ) Then we can compute the correction factor to M = ( M ( △ ; 81 ... SA ) ) assuming the wave function to be in the form of a product of the c.m. wave function and the internal wave function .
Page 24
Hence if we can factor out the c.m. wave function from the product = II ; ; ( r ; ) we can stick to calculating M with Yo but we have to multiply it by a correction factor : ( R ( r ) | exp ( i △ · r ) | R ( r ) ) −1 .
Hence if we can factor out the c.m. wave function from the product = II ; ; ( r ; ) we can stick to calculating M with Yo but we have to multiply it by a correction factor : ( R ( r ) | exp ( i △ · r ) | R ( r ) ) −1 .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Common terms and phrases
absorption additivity analysis approximately assume attenuation beam coherent collision complete components compute consider contribution corrections Coulomb Coulomb interactions coupling cross section db exp db exp i▲·b depend describe deuteron diffractive production processes discussed effects elastic scattering elastic scattering amplitude equation example excited existence experimental experiments expression fact factor field final formula forward given gives Glauber ground hadrons Hence high energy limit important incident particle inelastic initial Institute interactions introduce magnetic mass measurement momentum transfer multiple scattering Note nuclear nuclear targets nuclei nucleon numbers objects obtained parameters phase shifts photon photoproduction physical position possible problem profiles regeneration shadowing single Standards step strong structure technical vector meson wave function weak
Bibliographic information
| Title | Interactions of High Energy Particles with Nuclei Volume 139 of NBS monograph |
| Author | Wiesław Czyż |
| Publisher | National Bureau of Standards, 1975 |
| Original from | the University of Michigan |
| Digitized | 21 Nov 2007 |
| Length | 69 pages |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |