Interactions of High Energy Particles with NucleiNational Bureau of Standards, 1975 - 69 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 16
Page 6
... consider this case in more detail . a From the equation - i Əz :) ] + eV - Kẞ ( Σ1 · В1 - iα · E ) = 0 we can eliminate the ' trivial ' dependence on V by substituting ❤ = f - F exp ( -ie [ ' _ dz'V ( z , y , z ) ) , a · a -i Əz -eVF ...
... consider this case in more detail . a From the equation - i Əz :) ] + eV - Kẞ ( Σ1 · В1 - iα · E ) = 0 we can eliminate the ' trivial ' dependence on V by substituting ❤ = f - F exp ( -ie [ ' _ dz'V ( z , y , z ) ) , a · a -i Əz -eVF ...
Page 9
... consider a vector particle ( hence a very relevant kind of particle to our further analysis ) . Example 2. Scattering of a charged vector meson in a static field ( we shall quote the results , for more details see refs . [ 9 , 10 ] ...
... consider a vector particle ( hence a very relevant kind of particle to our further analysis ) . Example 2. Scattering of a charged vector meson in a static field ( we shall quote the results , for more details see refs . [ 9 , 10 ] ...
Page 10
... consider a charged particle with spin S and magnetic moment M given by ( 2.7 ) moving in an almost uniform magnetic field B. This particle follows a circular trajectory with frequency - 13 B. m Its magnetic moment ( hence its spin ) ...
... consider a charged particle with spin S and magnetic moment M given by ( 2.7 ) moving in an almost uniform magnetic field B. This particle follows a circular trajectory with frequency - 13 B. m Its magnetic moment ( hence its spin ) ...
Page 14
... consider some limiting cases of eq ( 3.2 ) ( compare ref . [ 12 ] ) . Let the radii of the two composite objects be R. and Rь . The calculations of ref . [ 12 ] show that the smaller is R , the nearer we are to the additivity of ( b ) ...
... consider some limiting cases of eq ( 3.2 ) ( compare ref . [ 12 ] ) . Let the radii of the two composite objects be R. and Rь . The calculations of ref . [ 12 ] show that the smaller is R , the nearer we are to the additivity of ( b ) ...
Page 15
... consider the " elementary " collisions ( whose scattering amplitude is determined by the profile ( b ) ) . As the wave passes a scatterer it gets modified by a factor 1 - y ( b ) . Hence , the probability that the particle gets removed ...
... consider the " elementary " collisions ( whose scattering amplitude is determined by the profile ( b ) ) . As the wave passes a scatterer it gets modified by a factor 1 - y ( b ) . Hence , the probability that the particle gets removed ...
Common terms and phrases
absorption additivity of phase anomalous magnetic moment ú approximately assume attenuation b+½s beam Bureau of Standards coherent diffractive production collision Compton scattering compute Coulomb interactions Czyż d³r db exp i▲·b deuteron diagonalization diffractive production processes diffractive scattering discussed double scattering elastic scattering amplitude electromagnetic equation example excited experiments factor Feynman diagrams formula four-momentum Glauber model hadrons Hence high energy limit incident particle incident wave inelastic shadowing Interactions of High invariant mass K mesons multiple scattering National Bureau neutrino neutrons ññ Note nuclear matter nuclear targets nuclei nucleon obtained optical theorem parameters phase shifts photon photoproduction of vector physical pion production amplitude profiles quantum numbers regeneration Řº shadowing effects single scattering spin strongly interacting target nucleus total cross section vector meson VMD model wave function γν Σ Σ