Interactions of High Energy Particles with NucleiNational Bureau of Standards, 1975 - 69 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 16
Page 6
... consider this case in more detail . a From the equation - i Əz :) ] + eV - Kẞ ( Σ1 · В1 - iα · E ) = 0 we can eliminate the ' trivial ' dependence on V by substituting ❤ = f - F exp ( -ie [ ' _ dz'V ( z , y , z ) ) , a · a -i Əz -eVF ...
... consider this case in more detail . a From the equation - i Əz :) ] + eV - Kẞ ( Σ1 · В1 - iα · E ) = 0 we can eliminate the ' trivial ' dependence on V by substituting ❤ = f - F exp ( -ie [ ' _ dz'V ( z , y , z ) ) , a · a -i Əz -eVF ...
Page 9
... consider a vector particle ( hence a very relevant kind of particle to our further analysis ) . Example 2. Scattering of a charged vector meson in a static field ( we shall quote the results , for more details see refs . [ 9 , 10 ] ...
... consider a vector particle ( hence a very relevant kind of particle to our further analysis ) . Example 2. Scattering of a charged vector meson in a static field ( we shall quote the results , for more details see refs . [ 9 , 10 ] ...
Page 10
... consider a charged particle with spin S and magnetic moment M given by ( 2.7 ) moving in an almost uniform magnetic field B. This particle follows a circular trajectory with frequency - 13 B. m Its magnetic moment ( hence its spin ) ...
... consider a charged particle with spin S and magnetic moment M given by ( 2.7 ) moving in an almost uniform magnetic field B. This particle follows a circular trajectory with frequency - 13 B. m Its magnetic moment ( hence its spin ) ...
Page 14
... consider some limiting cases of eq ( 3.2 ) ( compare ref . [ 12 ] ) . Let the radii of the two composite objects be R. and Rь . The calculations of ref . [ 12 ] show that the smaller is R , the nearer we are to the additivity of ( b ) ...
... consider some limiting cases of eq ( 3.2 ) ( compare ref . [ 12 ] ) . Let the radii of the two composite objects be R. and Rь . The calculations of ref . [ 12 ] show that the smaller is R , the nearer we are to the additivity of ( b ) ...
Page 15
... consider the " elementary " collisions ( whose scattering amplitude is determined by the profile ( b ) ) . As the wave passes a scatterer it gets modified by a factor 1 - y ( b ) . Hence , the probability that the particle gets removed ...
... consider the " elementary " collisions ( whose scattering amplitude is determined by the profile ( b ) ) . As the wave passes a scatterer it gets modified by a factor 1 - y ( b ) . Hence , the probability that the particle gets removed ...
Common terms and phrases
absorption additivity analysis approximately assume attenuation beam coherent collision complete components compute consider contribution corrections Coulomb Coulomb interactions coupling cross section db exp db exp i▲·b depend describe deuteron diffractive production processes discussed effects elastic scattering elastic scattering amplitude equation example excited existence experimental experiments expression fact factor field final formula forward given gives Glauber ground hadrons Hence high energy limit important incident particle inelastic initial Institute interactions introduce magnetic mass measurement momentum transfer multiple scattering Note nuclear nuclear targets nuclei nucleon numbers objects obtained parameters phase shifts photon photoproduction physical position possible problem profiles regeneration shadowing single Standards step strong structure technical vector meson wave function weak