Interactions of High Energy Particles with Nuclei |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 16
Page 6
Let us consider this case in more detail . a From the equation -2 + eV – KB ( 2. • B1 - ia . • E ) = 0 we can eliminate the ' trivial tek az [: - ) ] = dependence on V by substituting y dz'V ( x y , z ) R = Fexp ( -ie | « V ( 2 ...
Let us consider this case in more detail . a From the equation -2 + eV – KB ( 2. • B1 - ia . • E ) = 0 we can eliminate the ' trivial tek az [: - ) ] = dependence on V by substituting y dz'V ( x y , z ) R = Fexp ( -ie | « V ( 2 ...
Page 9
Let us consider a vector particle ( hence a very relevant kind of particle to our further analysis ) . Example 2. Scattering of a charged vector meson in a static field ( we shall quote the results , for more details see refs .
Let us consider a vector particle ( hence a very relevant kind of particle to our further analysis ) . Example 2. Scattering of a charged vector meson in a static field ( we shall quote the results , for more details see refs .
Page 10
In order to make the condition ( 2.7 ) more plausible , let us consider a charged particle with spin S and magnetic moment M given by ( 2.7 ) moving in an almost uniform magnetic field B. This particle follows a circular trajectory with ...
In order to make the condition ( 2.7 ) more plausible , let us consider a charged particle with spin S and magnetic moment M given by ( 2.7 ) moving in an almost uniform magnetic field B. This particle follows a circular trajectory with ...
Page 14
Let us consider some limiting cases of eq ( 3.2 ) ( compare ref . [ 12 ] ) . Let the radii of the two composite objects be Ra and Ry . The calculations of ref . [ 12 ] show that the smaller is Ro the nearer we are to the additivity of ...
Let us consider some limiting cases of eq ( 3.2 ) ( compare ref . [ 12 ] ) . Let the radii of the two composite objects be Ra and Ry . The calculations of ref . [ 12 ] show that the smaller is Ro the nearer we are to the additivity of ...
Page 15
... 0 ) = 2ik I. ° al ( +34 ) J. ( 2 ( 1 + 94 ) sin ) ( 1–1 ) , 0 0 bk = 1 + 12 , k db = dl , fel ( k , 0 ) < -ik * S * abb ) . ( Ab ) [ ( b ) – 1. ) , A = 2k sin 120 , η Ξηι . Optical theorem and unitarity Let us first consider the ...
... 0 ) = 2ik I. ° al ( +34 ) J. ( 2 ( 1 + 94 ) sin ) ( 1–1 ) , 0 0 bk = 1 + 12 , k db = dl , fel ( k , 0 ) < -ik * S * abb ) . ( Ab ) [ ( b ) – 1. ) , A = 2k sin 120 , η Ξηι . Optical theorem and unitarity Let us first consider the ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Common terms and phrases
absorption additivity analysis approximately assume attenuation beam Bureau of Standards charge coherent collision complete components compute consider contribution corrections Coulomb Coulomb interactions coupling cross section db exp depend describe deuteron diffractive production processes discussed effects elastic scattering elastic scattering amplitude equation example excited existence exp ia.b experimental experiments expression fact factor field final formula forward given gives Glauber ground hadrons Hence high energy limit important incident particle inelastic initial Institute interactions introduce magnetic mass measurement momentum transfer multiple scattering National Bureau Note nuclear nuclear targets nuclei nucleon numbers objects obtained parameters phase shifts photon photoproduction physical position possible present problem profiles regeneration shadowing single Standards step strong structure technical vector meson wave function
Bibliographic information
| Title | Interactions of High Energy Particles with Nuclei Volume 139 of NBS monograph |
| Author | Wiesław Czyż |
| Publisher | National Bureau of Standards, 1975 |
| Original from | the University of Michigan |
| Digitized | 21 Nov 2007 |
| Length | 69 pages |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |