Interactions of High Energy Particles with Nuclei |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 44
Page 2
Hence we shall start with the very successful model of such processes : the Glauber model . 2. Description of Multiple Scattering 2.1 . General Remarks To construct the relevant formulae for the theory of multiple scattering one can ...
Hence we shall start with the very successful model of such processes : the Glauber model . 2. Description of Multiple Scattering 2.1 . General Remarks To construct the relevant formulae for the theory of multiple scattering one can ...
Page 3
2m 3 Ay + ky = Vy , ha v = eikap ( x , y , z ) , 32 a2 26 Ay = eika + მი P ( x , y , z ) — kļeikzp + 2ikeikz az ar ? ду ? teika aze ' hence , neglecting second derivatives of y , we obtain the following equation for : до 2ikeikz az 2m ...
2m 3 Ay + ky = Vy , ha v = eikap ( x , y , z ) , 32 a2 26 Ay = eika + მი P ( x , y , z ) — kļeikzp + 2ikeikz az ar ? ду ? teika aze ' hence , neglecting second derivatives of y , we obtain the following equation for : до 2ikeikz az 2m ...
Page 5
( 2.3 ) Hence , in the limit Ewe have to have ( 1 - a3 ) 6-0 , ( 1 + 03 ) 4-2 . This is because the right - hand side of ( 2.3 ) does not contain the energy , E. We multiply eq ( 2.3 ) from the left by ...
( 2.3 ) Hence , in the limit Ewe have to have ( 1 - a3 ) 6-0 , ( 1 + 03 ) 4-2 . This is because the right - hand side of ( 2.3 ) does not contain the energy , E. We multiply eq ( 2.3 ) from the left by ...
Page 6
... this case we also have additivity of phase shifts — hence the Glauber model : But when K + 0 the principle of additivity of phase shifts breaks down . Let us consider this case in more detail . a From the equation -2 + eV – KB ( 2.
... this case we also have additivity of phase shifts — hence the Glauber model : But when K + 0 the principle of additivity of phase shifts breaks down . Let us consider this case in more detail . a From the equation -2 + eV – KB ( 2.
Page 7
Hence we have to use a z - ordered product to express x in a compact form : x = { explis . = dz'a ( x , y , z ' » , - ) ) } . ) Xi . Each infinitesimal step x ( z + Az ) – x ( z ) = iAzK ( 01.31 - idi.E10 , ) x ( 2 ) , x ( 2+ Az ) = eiA ...
Hence we have to use a z - ordered product to express x in a compact form : x = { explis . = dz'a ( x , y , z ' » , - ) ) } . ) Xi . Each infinitesimal step x ( z + Az ) – x ( z ) = iAzK ( 01.31 - idi.E10 , ) x ( 2 ) , x ( 2+ Az ) = eiA ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Common terms and phrases
absorption additivity analysis approximately assume attenuation beam Bureau of Standards charge coherent collision complete components compute consider contribution corrections Coulomb Coulomb interactions coupling cross section db exp depend describe deuteron diffractive production processes discussed effects elastic scattering elastic scattering amplitude equation example excited existence exp ia.b experimental experiments expression fact factor field final formula forward given gives Glauber ground hadrons Hence high energy limit important incident particle inelastic initial Institute interactions introduce magnetic mass measurement momentum transfer multiple scattering National Bureau Note nuclear nuclear targets nuclei nucleon numbers objects obtained parameters phase shifts photon photoproduction physical position possible present problem profiles regeneration shadowing single Standards step strong structure technical vector meson wave function