Medical Uses of StatisticsJohn C. Bailar III, Frederick Mosteller CRC Press, 2019 M05 20 - 480 pages This work explains the purpose of statistical methods in medical studies and analyzes the statistical techniques used by clinical investigators, with special emphasis on studies published in "The New England Journal of Medicine". It clarifies fundamental concepts of statistical design and analysis, and facilitates the understanding of research results. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 85
Page xxvi
... percent were clearly reported. A second problem facing scientists is how to get the most out of their statistical consultants. As explained in Chapter 18 (Statistical Consultation), effective collaboration with a statistical consultant ...
... percent were clearly reported. A second problem facing scientists is how to get the most out of their statistical consultants. As explained in Chapter 18 (Statistical Consultation), effective collaboration with a statistical consultant ...
Page 12
... percent or more of the prescribed dose had substantially lower mortality than subjects with poorer drug compliance; this evidence seemed to indicate that the drug was beneficial. But the same difference in mortality was observed between ...
... percent or more of the prescribed dose had substantially lower mortality than subjects with poorer drug compliance; this evidence seemed to indicate that the drug was beneficial. But the same difference in mortality was observed between ...
Page 32
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
Page 33
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
Page 35
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
You have reached your viewing limit for this book.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
analysis applied assessment assigned authors average calculated called cancer Chapter clinical trials combined comparison considered crossover decision depends described determine discussed disease drug effects Engl England Journal error estimate example expected experiment Figure findings fitted four give given groups Health hospital hypothesis important improvement included increase indicated interpretation interval issues Journal less means measurements ment meta-analysis mortality multiple myocardial infarction N Engl observed original outcome patients percent period population possible present probability problems procedures published questions randomized readers reasons reduce REFERENCES regression relation reported requires response risk sample scientific selection shows significant sometimes specific standard statistical methods subjects Table techniques therapy tion treated treatment usually variables variance Yes Yes