 | 1999 - 940 pages
...follows: (1) No State party shall expel, return ("refouler") or extradite a person to another State where there are substantial grounds for believing that he...considerations including, where applicable, the existence in the State concerned of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights.... | |
 | Louis B. Sohn - 1986 - 1118 pages
...Article 3 1. No State Party shall expel, return ("refouler") or extradite a person to another State where there are substantial grounds for believing that he...considerations including, where applicable, the existence in the State concerned of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights.... | |
 | M. Hamalengwa, Cees Flinterman, E. V. O. Dankwa - 1988 - 450 pages
...Article 3 1. No State Party shall expel, return ("refouler") or extradite a person to another State where there are substantial grounds for believing that he...considerations including, where applicable, the existence in the State concerned of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights.... | |
 | David A. Martin - 1988 - 244 pages
...that "no State Party shall expel, return ('refouler') or extradite a person to another State where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture."33 The European Commission on Human Rights has already held that, in certain circumstances,... | |
 | J. Hermann Burgers - 1988 - 300 pages
...criteria should be more precise and suggested that the wording in the Swedish draft should be replaced by "substantial grounds for believing that he would be" in danger of being subjected to torture. This wording was adopted in the revised Swedish draft. However, other words were also proposed, such... | |
 | Yoram Dinstein, Mala Tabory - 1990 - 418 pages
...Torture and its Consequences for the Law of Asylum, Extradition and Expulsion), 43 ZaoR V 537 (1983). substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture irrespective of the underlying motive for such treatment. If the prohibition of torture must be seen... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations - 1990 - 204 pages
...Article 3. I suggest the following reservation: That the determination under Article 3 as to whether "there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subject to torture," shall be made solely by the United States. ommendation that this reservation be... | |
 | Günter Hoog, Angela Steinmetz - 1993 - 660 pages
...3 1 . No State Party shall expel, return ("refouler") or extradite a person to another State where there are substantial grounds for believing that he...considerations including, where applicable, the existence in the State concerned of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights.... | |
 | Ko Swan Sik, M. C. W. Pinto, J. J. G. Syatauw - 1992 - 460 pages
...Punishment, "no State Party shall expel, return ('re/outer') or extradite a person to another State where there are substantial grounds for believing that he...would be in danger of being subjected to torture" [Article 3]. Indeed, the act of 'refoulemenf in such circumstances was held to constitute itself a... | |
 | Tom Zwart - 1994 - 270 pages
...Convention were a Contracting State knowingly to surrender a fugitive to another State where there were substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture, however heinous the crime allegedly committed. Extradition in such circumstances, while not explicitly... | |
| |
For the purpose of determining whether there are such grounds, the competent authorities shall take into account all relevant considerations including, where applicable, the existence in the State concerned of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or... 
