Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations for Fiscal Year 1992: Hearings Before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, United States Senate, One Hundred Second Congress, First Session, Part 2U.S. Government Printing Office, 1991 - 1056 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 5
Page 156
Please explain how the Department intends to use the funding increase in FY
1991 and why the Department has chosen not to use part of the increase to
adjust for inflation when the law requires precisely that . Answer . The FY 1991
increase ...
Please explain how the Department intends to use the funding increase in FY
1991 and why the Department has chosen not to use part of the increase to
adjust for inflation when the law requires precisely that . Answer . The FY 1991
increase ...
Page 292
We are requesting a 9 - percent increase for fiscal year 1992 . That appears to be
a substantial raise under the new budget rules . But it is bare bones given the
magnitude of our built - in mandatory cost increases and the amount of work to be
...
We are requesting a 9 - percent increase for fiscal year 1992 . That appears to be
a substantial raise under the new budget rules . But it is bare bones given the
magnitude of our built - in mandatory cost increases and the amount of work to be
...
Page 335
It is at these levels where specific initiatives designed to reach the vision , e . g . ,
increased productivity , will be planned and budgeted for in accordance with
prevailing public policy . $ 375 MILLION INCREASE FOR SOCIAL SECURITY ...
It is at these levels where specific initiatives designed to reach the vision , e . g . ,
increased productivity , will be planned and budgeted for in accordance with
prevailing public policy . $ 375 MILLION INCREASE FOR SOCIAL SECURITY ...
Page 683
The only identifiable reason for the increase included in the Council ' s
justification is a desire of the Council to increase distribution of its quarterly
newsletter from 20 , 000 to 25 , 000 individuals - - a 25 percent increase in
distribution .
The only identifiable reason for the increase included in the Council ' s
justification is a desire of the Council to increase distribution of its quarterly
newsletter from 20 , 000 to 25 , 000 individuals - - a 25 percent increase in
distribution .
Page 764
esophageal cancer increased by 5 percent , multiple myeloma up 11 . percent . In
persons over 65 the net change in mortality for all cancers combined is an
increase of 12 . 9 percent over the period 1973 to 1988 . Reviewing the figures in
...
esophageal cancer increased by 5 percent , multiple myeloma up 11 . percent . In
persons over 65 the net change in mortality for all cancers combined is an
increase of 12 . 9 percent over the period 1973 to 1988 . Reviewing the figures in
...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abuse activities additional Administration agencies AIDS alcohol Americans Answer applications appropriate areas assistance associated awarded budget cancer centers changes child clinical Committee concern conducted continue costs demonstration Department disabilities disease drug effective efforts established estimate evaluation families Federal fiscal funds going grants groups Head Health Service Human implementation important improve increase individuals infant initiative Institute issues look major meet million minority mortality nursing Office patients percent persons population prevention problems projects proposed public health Question received recent reduce request response risk rural Secretary Senator HARKIN Social Social Security Administration specific staff treatment trials understand UNIV University vaccine women