Page images
PDF
EPUB
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[blocks in formation]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

2-2

Average Energy Consumption Index by State

Residential Energy Consumption Indices of the
Largest Metropolitan Areas.

[blocks in formation]

Page

27

37

42

46

47

48

50

51

54

55

56

57

58

70

73

82

[blocks in formation]

1-2

1-3

Page

11

Sample Cover Letter and Report to Homeowner....... 17

Responses as a Percent of Questionnaires Sent
by Housing Value

32

33333333

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

34

40

43

1-8

1-7 Project Conserve Post Survey Interview

Ceiling Insulation by Age of Home Topeka....... 51

[blocks in formation]

INTRODUCTION

Fifteen percent of the total energy consumed in the United States is used for heating and cooling residential structures. This sector of the national energy profile is projected to continue to grow in absolute volume if not in per cent. It is appropriate, therefore, to consider residential structures as a prime target for energy conservation programs.

Although, ultimately, a balance should be struck between actions for existing homes and actions for homes yet to be constructed, rationale exists for centering initial effort on the retrofit of existing homes. The 1970 census indicated that 69% of the 67.7 million year-round housing units counted were single-family structures. This represents a large population with which to work toward optimal energy use. Focusing on single-family homes also provides an opportunity to use existing knowledge and materials to accomplish a variety of energy-conserving actions and yield immediate pay off.

Two major obstacles to the success of a retrofit approach to easing the energy demand are immediately identifiable:

[ocr errors][ocr errors]

individual homeowners may be reluctant to commit
their hard-won personal resources without
reasonable justification; and

homeowners, as a group, often lack a workable
understanding of the rather complex cost/
benefit considerations of various energy-
conserving retrofit options.

As a means of attempting to overcome these obstacles, a pilot test in homeowner energy conservation was conducted for the Federal Energy Administration, Energy Conservation and Environment, Buildings R&D Programs, under contract number 14-010001-1676, dated February 26, 1974.

The pilot project involved the distribution of questionnaires to selected homes in two cities. The recipients were requested, by letter, to complete voluntarily and return the questionnaire. The returned information described the house, in general, and included specific information about windows, doors and attics. After processing these data, a list of energy conserving retrofit actions was returned to the home owners. An estimate of the cost of each action was provided, both for do-it-yourself materials and for contractor performed services. In addition, an estimate was provided of the volume of fuel to be conserved and the savings in dollars to be expected. The number of years it would take to have the savings pay for the investment was also shown for each suggested action along with a calculated yield on investment.

« PreviousContinue »