Page images
PDF
EPUB
[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

PROGRAM SUMMARY

Public and Private Agencies, Model Cities

Day Care Corporation

Kansas City, Mo., Police Department

Community Services Department
Legal Aid and Defender Society
Legal Aid and Defender Society
Kansas City Police Department
Community Services Department
Jackson County Juvenile Court
Jackson County Juvenile Court
Jackson County Juvenile Court

Concentrated Employment
Program (CEP)

Neighborhood Planning Group

HDCIC

Parks and Recreation Department

Kansas City General Hospital

Human Resources Corporation

Volunteer Adult Tutoring

National Welfare Rights Organization

Public Works Department

U.S. Trade Schools, Inc.

Carver Neighborhood Center

Health Department

Richard Cabot Clinic

Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority

Neighborhood Planning Groups

[ocr errors][subsumed][merged small][merged small][graphic][merged small]

A NEW PARTNERSHIP

A NEW PARTNERSHIP

Kansas City Model Cities seeks to be a different kind of government agency.

⚫ Its goals are within reach.

Its method is planning-then action.

Its program is designed by the people it

serves.

Model Cities plans, co-ordinates, and evaluates an effort to improve the quality of urban life. Using the city as a workshop, it attempts to build a model-a pattern-of public and private efforts especially tailored to Kansas City's needs.

Those needs are not dictated by desk men, but are delineated by the citizens and government, working together in partnership. The citizens, aided by urban specialists, also suggest solutions which are incorporated in Model Cities projects. Finally, Model Neighborhood residents have the responsibility of working with government as partners in carrying out these projects.

Without citizens participating in the total effort, Model Cities will fail.

With them, it cannot help but succeed.

By the mid-Sixties it became apparent that the cities of America were in serious trouble, despite federal, state, and local governmental programs designed to relieve the causes of urban deterioration: poverty, crime, unemployment, the middle-class exodus to the suburbs, and the rest.

So the Demonstration Cities Act of 1966 was passed by Congress to create the Model Cities Program The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) was empowered to launch this broad creative approach to urban problems. Rather than by-passing local governments, HUD was to work closely with mayors and city councils Rather than initiating another single project program directed toward one functional problem, HUD was to administer a flexible approach to link related programs. Rather than imposing theories on citizens, HUD was to listen to the voice of the people in each of the Model Cities

Kansas City was among the first 63 cities chosen to begin this exciting experiment. The planning effort here officially began in August, 1968, when James I. Threatt assumed his duties as executive director of Kansas City Model Cities.

Major Model Cities functions include monitoring program administration, program planning, program evaluation, and business management and accounting. These activities are reflected in the staff. Major responsibilities for monitoring, planning, and evaluation is assigned' to program specialists in each of the functional areas, such as health, recreation, economic development, and so forth.

Seven areas were designated as the Model Neighborhoods: the West Side (Area 1), the inner city (Areas 2A, 2B, 2C, and 2D), Dunbar (Area 3 and Columbus Park (Area 4), and they were incorporated and funded for planning by Kansas City Model Cities. By action of the City Council, $10,000 was allocated to each NPG for the planning period. Each NPG was able to retain expert planning assistance of its own choice.

Then began hard work, evenings and weekends without pay, seeking a common goal

NPGs divided into functional committees for sach of 10 major fields of concern: municipal services and facilities; health, housing: transportation, welfare and social services, education, crime, delinquency and administration

[graphic]
« PreviousContinue »