I will point out for the information of all that the House has expended already for 3 years a total authorization of $370 million for the Allied Health Professions Training Act.

Also in July or in early August, the House passed the National Science Foundation Act, at another $537 million in new budget authority. Not all of that was the medical profession, but very likely, well, certainly 25 percent and probably as much as 35 percent was for health care.

At the end of June we were able to pass over the President's veto the $2.9 million Medical Facilities Construction and Modernization Act. That is Hill-Burton, in essence. I distinctly recall that when the time came for that vote, we got on what some of our colleagues call the horn-and talked with some who are interested in this program. We tried to reach Nate. We were able to reach Homer, and called our school over in the northeast part of town, Kansas City College of Osteopathy and Surgery. It is always a difficult decision when you come to the point of overriding a veto. There was no doubt but what it should have been overridden. We found at that time that Hill-Burton in its history has served almost 4,000 communities, and it has helped to a total of almost $12 billion, $11.6 billion in construction of hospital facilities over the years.

Also in early July, the House passed the HEW bill. We got by without a veto on that one, a $1.2 billion for general health services, mental health administration, and about $1.5 billion for other health, including NIH for the first time. Some of you may not have been knowledgeable, but we went into not only cancer, heart disease, stroke, dental problems, arthritic, and neurological, but the Institute at NIH was certainly an innovation for the first time.

Senator, and those who are on the distinguished list of witnesses, the really sorrowful and almost saddening aspect of overriding the veto, we had the votes to do it. The House has faced already this year four vetoes, the Senate faced up to at least two, have two in the offing, and have one left. After we were able to override the veto, we still did not have the votes as far as the Hill-Burton, that is, the medical facilities to fund the program, and that is what it is all about here this morning, whether we have the votes for the funding.

All of us have a list of priorities, and I am sure that for those two Members of the Congress who are here this morning, health care is at the very top of that list.

Senator, on our side, and not representing the inner city but the suburbs and the counties that go as far south nearly to Joplin, and out east to Sedalia and Marshall, a total of 14 counties in west central Missouri, as long as we happen to be a Member, we will continue to cast our vote for more money for the very important area that you are talking about here, because with all the brick and mortar and with all the other talks about insurance and the Kennedy bill, and on our side the Martha Griffith concept, it is going to be meaningless unless we have the manpower to fill the vacuum.

The startling thing about it all, and I am sure it will be developed, will be the almost unbelievable statistics that can be shown of the needs for medical manpower by the year 2000.

Thank you very much.

Senator EAGLETON. Thank you, Congressman Randall. We appreciate it. We know you are on a tight schedule. We are pleased you had the opportunity to be with us.

Congressman RANDALL. Thank you, Tom.

Senator EAGLETON. I might add a footnote to the Congressman's statement. He mentioned in his previous statement the allied health professions bill which is now in conference. Interestingly enough, one of the major items, if not the major item, of disagreement between the Senate version of that bill and the House version of the bill-a Conference committee is one that tries to unravel the differences between the two bodies-is a point that was put in on the Senate side of 100 million in special emergency funding for teaching hospitals. The House, or at least the conferees for the House, have been reluctant to accept that provision. It is interesting that the very focal point of today's meeting, in terms of medical manpower, and with the advent of a new teaching hospital and new medical school here in Kansas ty, that that would be the one item on which the conference is apparerv being hung up.

We thought it was an emergency, we still think it is an emergency far as medical manpower is concerned.

I would like now to call forward a group of three witnesses to make their presentation collectively, as it were.

Mr. Nathan J. Stark, immediate past chairman of the board of trustees, Kansas City General Hospital;

Mr. Homer C. Wadsworth, president, Kansas City Association of Trusts and Foundations: and

Mr. Herman J. Sutherland, chairman, Mid-American Comprehenve Health Planning Agency.

I am informed that Mr. Sutherland is out of town, but that Ned W. Sn. all, president, Health Resources Institute, and director and chairman of pediatrics, Children's Mercy Hospital, will pinch hit for Mr.

Sutherland.

Mr. Stark.

STATEMENT OF NATHAN J. STARK, IMMEDIATE PAST CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES, KANSAS CITY GENERAL HOSPITAL; GROUP VICE PRESIDENT, OPERATIONS, HALLMARK CARDS, INC.

Mr. STARK. Senator, I would like to start out by correcting a misconception on the part of some people who met yesterday, and that is Mr Wadsworth claiming that the title given to me at Hallmark, RP.V.P. in charge of operations, had something to do with get well cards. Laughter).

I would like at least to bring you greetings, and I hope, before we are through, not sympathy.

Rather than answer specifically the questions that you posed in your letter. I would propose that I give you a very brief background of a report on a Kansas City concept which, I think, is quite germane to all of the questions, and then having done this, I would suggest that I turn to Mr. Wadsworth who can give us some of the implications of this concept.

Twenty-five years ago the circle of interested people in medical and health needs was hardly more than a handful. Today the issues of medical care are before Congress, in debating forums, in the news, in popular magazines, and on the radio and TV, enlisting the interest of milions, the serious attention of thousands.

52 314 0-71—————16

In 1796 a group of benevolent doctors and laymen described their purpose as "that all the poor receive the benefits of a charity, the more refined as it is the more secret."

One hundred and forty-eight years later, a different medical policy was enunciated by President F. D. Roosevelt who declared among "basic human rights were adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health."

With this shift in concept, from charity to right, we need some practical new approaches and new techniques for defining and fulfilling these changes.

Let me give you a narrative case illustrated of what happened in Kansas City when public and private efforts were blended together at both operation and planning level. The history of our city hospital, Kansas City General Hospital, has paralleled with extraordinary fidelity the development of all other hospitals and, in fact, provides us with a panorama of what has happened in the field of medical care and particularly in the care of the indigent and medically indigent sick. The hospital had been operated in one form or another by the city for 100 years. It ran a pretty good show for its time; contributed to the medical education of many doctors, but soon medical science and advancements passed it by. As a result of failure of budget requests to be approved by the city, lack of maintenance to the buildings, unrealistic personnel policies, and mounting frustrations and discouragement among administrative and professional personnel alike, a number of hazards for the patient were created and several departments of the hospital were put in jeopardy for State and national approval.

The hospital was running the unfortunate downhill course which many such city hospitals have pursued. While there was an awareness of the financial difficulties with which the city was struggling, one could not approve the philosophy of operating at a substandard level a municipal service whose responsibility is the lives and health of thousands of its citizens. In addition to its financial woes, the complexities of operating a hospital, a very highly scientific program, as one of 16 departments was beyond the city's capacity.

Conditions had, in 1961, reached a catastrophic climax. A new and imaginative modus operandi had to be found. It came in the form of a suggestion made by one of our leading citizens. He proposed that a nonprofit, voluntary corporation be formed to operate the municipal hospital system under contract with the city. The general purposes to be served were first to find ways to stabilize the hospital operations; to assume qualitatively high quality of care to patients; to utilize clinical material available for training at all levels; and to assure maximum efficiency in the performance of these functions.

In 1962, following this concept, the general hospital and medical center was incorporated under the not-for-profit laws of the State of Missouri. On May 18, 1962, a contract was made and executed between this corporation and the city for the operation of the city's hospitals. Among other provisions was the freedom of this private corporation to enter into affiliate arrangements with various hospitals in the Greater Kansas City area for the purpose of extending resident and intern training in part to those hospitals which agreed to provide adequate supervision for postgraduate training. It is worthy to note

tist the entire voluntary system of this area was in serious trouble for lack of an adequate supply of a house staff to assure proper levels of services to patients.

One of the first actions of the new corporation was to affiliate with the School of Medicine of the University of Missouri for postgra luate training in medicine.

Some money had to be found at once, apart from city revenues, to create the necessary arrangements with the University of Missouri ai to develop as promptly as possible teaching and research pro

As evidence of public awareness and support for that concept, prirate funds were obtained for a full-time medical staff. As a direct resuit of this support, provision of adequate space, and an opportanty to innovate and a dream for a new medical future, the hospital has attracted many doctors from great institutions around the

Tas the groundwork was laid for a complete health center. Let e now present in chronological order the following developments: In 1962, the Kansas City urban renewal program approved the Hospital Hill development which includes approximately 135 acres. In 1963, Children's Mercy Hosital decided to locate its new buildgon Hospital Hill. Children's Mercy Hospital is joined to the medical center in a tripartite contract between Kansas City General Hospital and Medical Center Corp. and the board of curators of the University of Missouri.

In 1964 the dental school of the University of Missouri at KanCity was planned on Hospital Hill and is now completed and rupied.

In 1966, the Western Missouri Mental Health Center opened on Hospital Hill. It and the psychiatric receiving center, now a part of the State program, provide major programs to help patients. In 1967, the voters of Jackson County approved bonds for a new tea hing hospital on Hospital Hill by a 4 to 1 majority. Approximately $13 million are available for this project.

In March of 1968, the Brothers of Mercy joined the medical center complex and are presently building an extended care facility on the 2.1.

In June of 1969, the University of Missouri Board of Curators pased a resolution establishing a medical school in Kansas City. In June of this year, 1970, the Missouri State Legislature provided nstruction funds for a State matching grant, and the Governor ed this bill in July.

In August of 1970, the Federal grant of $8.8 million was awarded for the medical school.

In the spring of 1970, the division of physician manpower notified the Jackson County Court that the application for Federal construction assistance to replace the existing general hospital was approved in the amount of $9.9 million. As of this date, a grant award has not

teen made.

The Kansas City Medical Center complex, as evident, represents a mayor resource of medical health care in Kansas City.

The potential exists now for the development of one of the finest baith care, educational, and research centers in the Midwest.

I should note here that the General Hospital Corp. experiment suggests one workable way to blend the sort of viable mix which is indicated if we are to maximize personal health service programs within the limits of jurisdiction and tradition. Conceivably, the general hospital model has some transfer value for dealing with problems in other areas of the United States.

Senator, I might add that since you are going to New York you might be interested in knowing that in the city of New York they have adopted a modified version of our plan after having visited with us and asking our people to visit with them in New York.

Thank you.

Senator EAGLETON. Thank you, Mr. Stark.

I think we will hear the presentations of all the witnesses and then question the group, with anyone fielding the question who thinks he is the most informed in that area.

Mr. Wadsworth.

STATEMENT OF HOMER C. WADSWORTH, PRESIDENT, KANSAS CITY ASSOCIATION OF TRUSTEES AND FOUNDATIONS

Mr. WADSWORTH. Far be it from me in the presence of a good friend and distinguished Senator from St. Louis to suggest that everything is up to date here. You know better, Tom.

What I think can be suggested is that what is going on here has lively prospects, as we will attempt to indicate, and may have implications far beyond the particular circumstances in the Kansas City region today.

It will be quite apparent as we proceed that a determined effort is being made here in Kansas City by a great many people, and in all sorts of related ways, to create a new and improved system for providing medical care. It is the purpose of my remarks to suggest the main purposes that together we seek to serve, the kind of problems that we have encountered to this date, and the major obstacles that we have yet to master as we move forward with this program.

Our fundamental aim is to develop the means by which to provide comprehensive medical services to all of our people on the most efficient, humane, and economical basis possible. We include in the range of such services those activities designed to prevent and control disease and disability. What we seek for is the capability of delivering the right amount of service at the right place and at the most appropriate

time.

A plan of medical service must proceed from some sort of base of operations. This is why the Kansas City General Hospital and the recently authorized new medical school of the University of MissouriKansas City are the keystones of our plan and program.

I might indicate that when I refer here, for purposes of shorthand, to General, I am talking about the complex of facilities that are here located and the people involved, the dental school, the substantial complex of psychiatric facilities, with which you are very familiar, that are on this hill, the Brothers of Mercy facility, the medical school in general itself, and Children's Mercy Hospital, which is one of the leading children's institutions in the country today.