Trade Practice and Price Law, FederalCommerce Clearing House, Incorporated, Loose Leaf Service Division of the Corporation Trust Company, 1938 - 265 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 6
Page 3
... Klesner case - public interest must be spe- cific and substantial - Algoma Lumber case -specific finding not necessary - equal guilt of competitors does not defeat jurisdiction . XXIII . The Commission Method ... Function is remedial ...
... Klesner case - public interest must be spe- cific and substantial - Algoma Lumber case -specific finding not necessary - equal guilt of competitors does not defeat jurisdiction . XXIII . The Commission Method ... Function is remedial ...
Page 171
... Klesner , 280 U. S. 19 , and cases there cited ; Algoma Lum ber Co. case , 291 U. S. 67 ; Federal Trade Commission v . Royal Milling Co. , 288 U. S. 212 . In the Klesner case , supra , there was nothing to indi- cate more than a private ...
... Klesner , 280 U. S. 19 , and cases there cited ; Algoma Lum ber Co. case , 291 U. S. 67 ; Federal Trade Commission v . Royal Milling Co. , 288 U. S. 212 . In the Klesner case , supra , there was nothing to indi- cate more than a private ...
Page 262
... Klesner : Federal Trade Com- 79 , 84 , 186 mission v . .42 , 171 176 , 180 , 184 witnesses 236 L Holding companies 106 Labor Horizontal agreements 148 Hostile competition 153 anti - trust acts practices 15 .186 I strikes Loss leaders ...
... Klesner : Federal Trade Com- 79 , 84 , 186 mission v . .42 , 171 176 , 180 , 184 witnesses 236 L Holding companies 106 Labor Horizontal agreements 148 Hostile competition 153 anti - trust acts practices 15 .186 I strikes Loss leaders ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action adjudged unfair agreements amended anti-trust acts appears Association bad faith Baking Powder Beech-Nut Packing Co brand cease and desist certiorari Chapter circuit court Clayton Act Commis commission or board commodities Company competing competitors complaint contracts coöperative corporation court of appeals customers dealers deceptive disparaging District effect employed enforce evidence facts false advertisement Falsely claiming Falsely representing Federal Trade Commission filing hinder competition illegal induce injury interstate commerce jobbers jurisdiction Klesner manufacturers ment methods of competition Miller-Tydings misrepresenting monopoly morals pany person petition price discrimination proceedings prohibited public interest public policy purchase purpose render resale price maintenance restraint of trade retailer Robinson-Patman Act Section seller Selling Sherman Act shown simulation sion sold statutes Supreme Court taxes tendency thereof tion Trade Commission Act trade restraint transaction unfair methods United unlawful vendor violation Wholesale Grocers