Moral Constraints on War: Principles and CasesBruno Coppieters, N. Fotion Lexington Books, 2002 - 321 pages Moral Constraints on War offers a principle-by-principle presentation of the transcultural roots of the ethics of war in an age defined by the increasingly international nature of military intervention. Parts one and two trace the evolution of Just War theory, analyzing the principles of jus ad bellum and jus in bello: the principles that determine under what conditions a war may be started and then conducted. Each chapter provides the historical background of the principle under discussion, an explanation of the principle, and numerous historical examples of its application. In Part three, case studies apply the theories discussed to the Gulf War, the 1994 Russian intervention in Chechnya, NATO's humanitarian mission in Kosovo, and the U.S. military's actions in Afghanistan in the wake of the World Trade Center attacks. Bringing together an international coterie of philosophers and political scientists this accessible and practical guide offers students of military ethics, international law, and social conflict rich, up-to-the-minute insight into the pluralistic character of Just War Theory. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 64
Page xiii
... reasons for this insistence . Traditionally there have been good relations between Baghdad and Moscow . Russia had economic motives as well , since the sanctions made it impossible for Iraq to pay back the large debt it owed Russia ...
... reasons for this insistence . Traditionally there have been good relations between Baghdad and Moscow . Russia had economic motives as well , since the sanctions made it impossible for Iraq to pay back the large debt it owed Russia ...
Page 1
... reasons ( i.e. , those that take the interests of other nations and their people into account ) before actually starting the war . Second , strong realists claim that once a war starts , moral considerations remain inoperative . Thus ...
... reasons ( i.e. , those that take the interests of other nations and their people into account ) before actually starting the war . Second , strong realists claim that once a war starts , moral considerations remain inoperative . Thus ...
Page 2
... reasons do they give for holding what seems to moralists and pacifists to be an outlandish position ? The best answer ... reason not to attack . Indeed it would be foolish not to . On such a self - interest account , the world stage on ...
... reasons do they give for holding what seems to moralists and pacifists to be an outlandish position ? The best answer ... reason not to attack . Indeed it would be foolish not to . On such a self - interest account , the world stage on ...
Page 3
... leading his country down the nonmoral road of profit to his nation and , very likely , to himself . Insofar as realist rulers can mimic moral behavior ( for reasons of self - interest , of course ) , they will Introduction 3.
... leading his country down the nonmoral road of profit to his nation and , very likely , to himself . Insofar as realist rulers can mimic moral behavior ( for reasons of self - interest , of course ) , they will Introduction 3.
Page 4
... reason is that some realists claim that their theory actually falls within the domain of ethics . 9 The form that their national ethics takes is of rulers doing their duty to protect the state and the people within it . In princi- ple ...
... reason is that some realists claim that their theory actually falls within the domain of ethics . 9 The form that their national ethics takes is of rulers doing their duty to protect the state and the people within it . In princi- ple ...
Contents
Jus and Bellum | 25 |
Legitimate Authority | 41 |
Right Intentions | 59 |
Likelihood of Success | 79 |
Proportionality | 91 |
Last Resort | 101 |
Jus in Bello | 129 |
Discrimination | 141 |
The First Chechen War 19941996 | 177 |
The NATO Intervention in the Kosovo Crisis MarchJune 1999 | 205 |
NATOs Intervention in the Kosovo Crisis Whose Justice? | 229 |
After Kosovo Moral and Legal Constraints on Humanitarian Intervention | 247 |
The Military Response of the USLed Coalition to the September 11 Attacks | 265 |
Concluding Comments | 293 |
309 | |
About the Contributors | 319 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Afghanistan aggression air campaign al-Qaeda Albanian Albanian Kosovars allies armed army attack bombing Bosnian Serbs Bruno Coppieters casualties cause Chechen Chechnya civilian claim combat concerning conflict considered countries crisis Cuba decision declared defense diplomatic Dudayev ethics Federation fighting France French German guerrilla human rights humanitarian intervention international community international law Iraq Iraqi jus ad bellum jus in bello justice justified killed Kosovars Kosovo Kuwait land mines Last Resort leadership Legitimate Authority Likelihood of Success means military actions military force moral Moscow NATO NATO's negotiations noncombatants Operation Enduring Freedom Pakistan peace percent policies political population Principle of Discrimination Principle of Legitimate Principle of Proportionality realists reason Republic resistance Resolution response Right Intentions Russian sanctions secession secessionist Security Council self-defense Serbia sovereignty Soviet Union Taliban Taliban regime targets territory terrorist Theory threat tion tional troops UN Security Council United Nations University Press violations Walzer wars World Yugoslav Yugoslavia
Popular passages
Page 4 - You cannot qualify war in harsher terms than I wilL War is cruelty, and you cannot refine it: and those who brought war into our Country deserve all the curses and maledictions a people can pour out. I know I had no hand in making this war, and I know I will make more sacrifices today than any of you to Secure Peace. But you cannot have Peace and a Division of our Country.
Page 5 - You might as well appeal against the thunder-storm as against these terrible hardships of war. They are inevitable, and the only way the people of Atlanta can hope once more to live in peace and quiet at home, is to stop the war, which can only be done by admitting that it began in error and is perpetuated in pride.
Page 2 - In international society all forms of coercion are permissible, including wars of destruction. This means that the struggle for power is identical with the struggle for survival, and the improvement of the relative power position becomes the primary objective of the internal and the external policy of states.
References to this book
In War We Trust: The Bush Doctrine and the Pursuit of Just War Chris J. Dolan No preview available - 2005 |