Moral Constraints on War: Principles and CasesBruno Coppieters, N. Fotion Lexington Books, 2002 - 321 pages Moral Constraints on War offers a principle-by-principle presentation of the transcultural roots of the ethics of war in an age defined by the increasingly international nature of military intervention. Parts one and two trace the evolution of Just War theory, analyzing the principles of jus ad bellum and jus in bello: the principles that determine under what conditions a war may be started and then conducted. Each chapter provides the historical background of the principle under discussion, an explanation of the principle, and numerous historical examples of its application. In Part three, case studies apply the theories discussed to the Gulf War, the 1994 Russian intervention in Chechnya, NATO's humanitarian mission in Kosovo, and the U.S. military's actions in Afghanistan in the wake of the World Trade Center attacks. Bringing together an international coterie of philosophers and political scientists this accessible and practical guide offers students of military ethics, international law, and social conflict rich, up-to-the-minute insight into the pluralistic character of Just War Theory. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 38
Page xiii
... policies should not be underes- timated . The embargo policies generated a process of gradual but progressive destruction of the economy and the infrastructure of a relatively wealthy country . Children suffered chronic or even acute ...
... policies should not be underes- timated . The embargo policies generated a process of gradual but progressive destruction of the economy and the infrastructure of a relatively wealthy country . Children suffered chronic or even acute ...
Page 5
... policies and militaristic ones , in large part because of the difficulties of implementing the militaristic doctrine . However , in spite of these reasons for confusion , there are significant differences between the two positions ...
... policies and militaristic ones , in large part because of the difficulties of implementing the militaristic doctrine . However , in spite of these reasons for confusion , there are significant differences between the two positions ...
Page 8
... policies that , in the view of the protesters , would in- evitably lead to nuclear war and the destruction of the whole planet . These mobilizations were not directed at the legitimacy of military defense as such.22 The participants ...
... policies that , in the view of the protesters , would in- evitably lead to nuclear war and the destruction of the whole planet . These mobilizations were not directed at the legitimacy of military defense as such.22 The participants ...
Page 9
... policies but also the legitimacy of the state . The state is the in- strument of violence and Christians should therefore not participate in poli- tics and hold public office : " Government is violence , Christianity is meek- ness , non ...
... policies but also the legitimacy of the state . The state is the in- strument of violence and Christians should therefore not participate in poli- tics and hold public office : " Government is violence , Christianity is meek- ness , non ...
Page 10
... policies . Thus when negotiations with aggressors fail and all attempts at ne- gotiation prove fruitless , a nation may still have capabilities for civil , that is , nonviolent , resistance -- the second version of Pacifism . For its ...
... policies . Thus when negotiations with aggressors fail and all attempts at ne- gotiation prove fruitless , a nation may still have capabilities for civil , that is , nonviolent , resistance -- the second version of Pacifism . For its ...
Contents
Jus and Bellum | 25 |
Legitimate Authority | 41 |
Right Intentions | 59 |
Likelihood of Success | 79 |
Proportionality | 91 |
Last Resort | 101 |
Jus in Bello | 129 |
Discrimination | 141 |
The First Chechen War 19941996 | 177 |
The NATO Intervention in the Kosovo Crisis MarchJune 1999 | 205 |
NATOs Intervention in the Kosovo Crisis Whose Justice? | 229 |
After Kosovo Moral and Legal Constraints on Humanitarian Intervention | 247 |
The Military Response of the USLed Coalition to the September 11 Attacks | 265 |
Concluding Comments | 293 |
309 | |
About the Contributors | 319 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Afghanistan aggression air campaign al-Qaeda Albanian Albanian Kosovars allies armed army attack bombing Bosnian Serbs Bruno Coppieters casualties cause Chechen Chechnya civilian claim combat concerning conflict considered countries crisis Cuba decision declared defense diplomatic Dudayev ethics Federation fighting France French German guerrilla human rights humanitarian intervention international community international law Iraq Iraqi jus ad bellum jus in bello justice justified killed Kosovars Kosovo Kuwait land mines Last Resort leadership Legitimate Authority Likelihood of Success means military actions military force moral Moscow NATO NATO's negotiations noncombatants Operation Enduring Freedom Pakistan peace percent policies political population Principle of Discrimination Principle of Legitimate Principle of Proportionality realists reason Republic resistance Resolution response Right Intentions Russian sanctions secession secessionist Security Council self-defense Serbia sovereignty Soviet Union Taliban Taliban regime targets territory terrorist Theory threat tion tional troops UN Security Council United Nations University Press violations Walzer wars World Yugoslav Yugoslavia
Popular passages
Page 4 - You cannot qualify war in harsher terms than I wilL War is cruelty, and you cannot refine it: and those who brought war into our Country deserve all the curses and maledictions a people can pour out. I know I had no hand in making this war, and I know I will make more sacrifices today than any of you to Secure Peace. But you cannot have Peace and a Division of our Country.
Page 5 - You might as well appeal against the thunder-storm as against these terrible hardships of war. They are inevitable, and the only way the people of Atlanta can hope once more to live in peace and quiet at home, is to stop the war, which can only be done by admitting that it began in error and is perpetuated in pride.
Page 2 - In international society all forms of coercion are permissible, including wars of destruction. This means that the struggle for power is identical with the struggle for survival, and the improvement of the relative power position becomes the primary objective of the internal and the external policy of states.
References to this book
In War We Trust: The Bush Doctrine and the Pursuit of Just War Chris J. Dolan No preview available - 2005 |